Marius

Eric, here we go...

I would never purchase anything (not only a nihonto) with such low-res pictures. Jason, I don't think it makes much sense to post such items - the pics simply do not disclose enough.

Ian and All, your kind help is very appreciated. I cannot stop being amazed how such knowledgeable people are willing to share knowledge they have gained over many years with newbies. This post has another positive aspect - while I am a tsuba enthusiast with interest for nihonto and its historic fittings, I have never really gained any knowledge about katchu. This will now change :-) Many many thanks, also on behalf of my friend.

and... another picture. It is like pulling teeth :lol:

Based on the composition and style - very late Soten style tsuba.

Gosh, my friend is producing these pics rather slowly I will post them as they come. Apologies Here is one of one of the wakidate. I know nothing about Japanese armour (I need to buy Ian's book first) but this looks too clumsy for any kind of Japanese work..

OK, here is what I have got from my friend: "The original urusi was dark brown, and the brows are in this colour. Fukigaeshi are covered with leather and fringed with a cord. The ka-mon of three hats (?) are engraved. Wakidate can be removed. They are made of thin plate, look like they have never been restored." I'll try to get some close ups from him.... Thanks again :-)

Eric, many thanks for your help Since I am posting this on behalf of a friend, I have to relay your questions to him. I will be back with answers soon. An many, many thanks to Ian for his valuable input. Thank you so much Ian

OK, attached is another pic of the kabuto.

Jason, what is most important is your approach :-) I guess nobody can follow the sound advice not to buy anything before having gained some knowledge. I would refrain from further purchases until you have seen much more and learned much more. One day, you'll look at this sword and say: "*****************" and you might still like it, because it was one of the early purchases. A sounder approach would be, however, selling that one above your purchase cost and saving for a good sword. Now, a good sword does not have to expensive, though it does not come cheap. Look at this one (one of many): http://www.ksky.ne.jp/~sumie99/sword16.html It is o-suriage, hence cheap. Still, a solid koto. One of many.

OK, it is hard to describe, but you might want to compare old patina with "new patina", be it on a nakago or tsuba. True patina is like porn, tough to define, but you recognise it when you see it. Try to compare your sword's nakago with that of a good sword. Spot the difference. You need to see some good swords, with good nakago. Good nakago has yasurime, even if it is quite old. Yours does not and there is a reason for this... BTW, the nakago should not smell at all. Another hint: think how much you have paid for it. I dare say it was not exactly expensive. Think of the possible reasons why: 1. The sword is pretty average 2. The sword is saiha 3. The nakago has been repatinated for whatever reason 4. The sword is tired 5. The sword is otherwise flawed Just trying to tell you that buying nihonto is not that easy. One of my first swords had a hagire, thank goodness I have managed to spot it and return the sword. Another one I gave stupidly to a "polisher" who ruined it by polishing it down and who produced a fake hamon. It still hurts, but I had no NMB back then.

The only pic I have got at the moment.... Doesn't disclose much, does it.

Morita-san, Arigato gozaimasu

Have a look at the patina. There are several tell-tale signs... Is it "dry"? What is the colour? Does the tang smell in any way? Are there any pittings? Other signs would include mizukage, but this is not always proof of re-tempering... The best thing would be to ask the polisher, anyway :-)

Dear All, this is clearly beyond my modest abilities... This tag was attached to a kabuto. I suppose it is a dealer's inventory tag, but I would be grateful for your help. Thank you for your time

OK, based on your pics only... I might be wrong, so take this with a grain of salt: 1. Tang looks like it was burnt at some time, do I see fire-scale here? 2. Yakiba is unusually broad 3. Hamon slides down before thehamachi, and the notare is somewhat unusual Conclusion: this might be a retempered blade (saiha)

It is a badly battered blade. It has probably been buffed in the past. Here are blade shapes: http://www.ksky.ne.jp/~sumie99/styles.html

The seller says "tosho", not "ko-tosho". That would explain the price. It would be nice to know what the hakogaki says...

Dear All, has anyone any experience with this dealer? http://www.silk-road.us/higo.html Thanks for your time :-)

What do you think does this motif mean? Thanks for your time

This is not a tsuba. It has no seppa dai. IMHO, of course

David, this is a wonderful tsuba. Very good example of how good ko-Shoami can be. Another example is here, you might want to see it quickly before Rich pulls the plug (he has sold it, and I could not afford it at that time ) http://www.nihonto-bijutsubu.com/person ... mokko.html

The plugs are nice, no? Seriously - zogan is gone, what a pity. The huge lumps of tekkotsu on the plate show that this might be a late tsuba, a revival piece. In such tekkotsu are often overdone in an attempt to imitate pre-Edo tsuba. On this tsuba it looks like the maker could not control tekkotsu - these lumps are unsightly. Just my two cents

There are remnants of zogan on the rim. The workmanship seems quite crude without being deliberately restrained. Thickness is quite substantial as well, and I don't see the iron being of very good quality. The composition of the sukashi lacks elegance so typical for ko-Shoami My guess is mid or late Edo.

Kanekiyo it is, then. Thank you, gentlemen