Jump to content


Photo

Yoshisuke Wakizashi

wakizashi

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Shamsy

Shamsy

    Jo Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 959 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 27 January 2020 - 03:43 AM

Hello all,

I finally got around to asking for assistance translating my wakizashi mei. Thanks to Ray and Peter, I know it was signed by Yoshisuke. Peter also provided some additional information, but because I'm on my 6 monthly care routine, I thought I'd get some additional pictures and see what everyone thinks now I have decent pictures of the activity.

Extract of what Peter provided:
"I thought that this would be a chance for us to introduce the difference between ON and KUN pronunciations. I though that these very (very) late Shoshu guys signed with these characters that we all think of a "Yoshisuke", but went with the name "GISUKE". This is also when the Soshu-den was dissolving in the Muromachi era. There certainly seems to have been a demand for these solid hirazukuri "otanto" at that time. They are quite worthy - by one name or another!"

Attached Thumbnails

  • 20200127_122805.jpg
  • 20200127_122903.jpg
  • 20200127_122748.jpg
  • 20200127_122828.jpg
  • 20200127_123100.jpg
  • 20200127_123156.jpg
  • 20200127_123142.jpg
  • 20200127_123128.jpg
  • 20200127_123115.jpg
  • 20200127_123015.jpg
  • 20200127_123001.jpg
  • 20200127_122946.jpg
  • 20200127_122933.jpg

  • raymondsinger likes this
Steve
Collecting Type 95 NCO swords

#2 SAS

SAS

    Sai Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 1,939 posts
  • LocationAmerican Samoa

Posted 27 January 2020 - 03:50 AM

Nice! :clap:


  • Shamsy likes this

Steve Shimanek
Artist Blacksmith/Bladesmith

Life Member VFW, US Army Desert Shield/Desert Storm

www.oloteleforge.com


#3 Shamsy

Shamsy

    Jo Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 959 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 27 January 2020 - 08:36 AM

So if I may ask for some clarification:

The sword is technically (according to measures I find online and in Connoisseurs) a wakizashi in length (just), though Peter has mentioned it is an otanto, which I believe basically means 'big tanto'. Is the measurements of swords a given for their classification, or are there exceptions to the basic rules? I ask this as I have never seen a tanto in full navy koshirae before, only wakizashi.

Peter has said the sword is quite worthy. Does that mean that it would likely paper at shinsa? There is some ware apparent, though I don't believe that precludes papering in the slightest.

Sounds like it was made in the Muromachi era, but can anyone offer a suggested century?

General comments, information etc is very welcome and desired. I've steadily forgotten more about traditional swords than I remember.
Steve
Collecting Type 95 NCO swords

#4 EdWolf

EdWolf

    Jo Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 497 posts
  • LocationThe Netherlands

Posted 27 January 2020 - 09:04 AM

Steve,

 

The definition of a wakizashi changed over time. Markus Sesko wrote a nice artikel about it.

 

https://markussesko..../the-wakizashi/

 

You can also call your blade a Ko-Wakizashi (slightly bigger than a Tanto). So a ko-wakizashi in full navy Koshirae.


  • Shamsy likes this

Ed






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: wakizashi

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

IPB Skin By Virteq