Thekirsh Posted February 16, 2007 Report Posted February 16, 2007 I was wondering if I could get a few comments on the listing below http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll ... &rd=1&rd=1 School,age,value? And without boshi around the tip should I even be looking at it ? Thanks Simon Quote
John A Stuart Posted February 16, 2007 Report Posted February 16, 2007 Hi Simon, When a sword has no temper in the boshi it has a fatal flaw and is a conversation piece with only a few words. Pity, oooh darn, ah well. Does the fittings have value? Well, at the price it is now, I think not. I would pass on this. Pity. John Quote
Thekirsh Posted February 17, 2007 Author Report Posted February 17, 2007 Thanks John, I will take your advice and give it a miss,as you said its a pity. Regards Simon Quote
Guest Simon Rowson Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 Hi Simon, I don't know if I'm missing something but I can't see anything in the description that says there is no temper in the boshi. The seller just states: THE TEMPERING DOES NOT RUN THROUGH THE TIP Possibly, this means he has done his homework a little (as is suggested by his other comments) and is saying the hamon does not run off into space near the kissaki. I certainly can't see anything on this blade that suggests a reshaped kissaki. It all looks pretty nice to me and doesn't give me any real cause for concern apart from the Showa period civilian mounts which are fairly common on contemporary gendaito and showato but not on older blades. Best wishes, (another) Simon Quote
Brian Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 He does have the following 2 comments: THE BLADE WAS POSSIBLY SHORTENED BACK WHEN THE Japanese WENT FROM HORSES TO INFRANTRY SOULDIERS. Then he says: THE LENGTH OF THE TANG WAS POSSIBLY LONGER TOO This leads me to believe his first comment was related to shortening from the front backwards. That is how I would take it anyways. It really doesn't look like the kissaki has been altered, but I am thinking of a very nice Shinto katana that I once traded for that had a perfect kissaki with hi, and looked perfect..but the hamon ran straight off the end. It was a real pity, and I spent quite a while trying to convince myself that I was seeing things, but it was true. Eventually traded it back to the seller. maybe not the case here, but it should definitely be clarified before putting money into it though. Brian Quote
John A Stuart Posted February 17, 2007 Report Posted February 17, 2007 Yes, That was what I understood. That this sword had been shortened from the tip back. John Quote
Guest Simon Rowson Posted February 18, 2007 Report Posted February 18, 2007 Hi Brian and John, Yes, if that's the case then this is obviously one to avoid. But....that kissaki and the relative position of the hi really does look untouched to me so I think that Simon should ask for more info and pictures before writing it off entirely. As Brian says, however, the unaltered position of the hi doesn't always guarantee a boshi if the post-war owners have, say, used the sword to toast muffins in a fire using the kissaki! Simon Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.