Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello,

what are your guys opinions on this wakizashi that I am pretty sure is signed Hizen No Kuni Tadayoshi. Does the signature look authentic or is it a gimei? If it is authentic which generation Tadayoshi would this most likely have been forged by? Also I noticed it had a habaki with a wave motif on it. Not sure if it could be related to the blade or not? Please let me know what you all think.

thanks,

chansen

 

 

 

 

 

IMG_1939.jpeg

IMG_1941.jpeg

IMG_1942.jpeg

IMG_1943.jpeg

IMG_1940.jpeg

Edited by CNS_44
Posted
30 minutes ago, PNSSHOGUN said:

Hi Chansen, unfortunately the style of the Mei differs from what you would expect from Hizen blades. 

 

https://www.sho-shin.com/shinto-hizen.html 

I was kinda expecting this. Do you think this blade was forged during the edo period or possibly during the Muromachi judging by the hamon and blade shape and also the nakago because the oxidation is very dark black looking. Was this possibly maybe an older blade which had a gimei signature added later during a period when it was common?

Posted

It would more likely be from the Edo period, difficult to say anymore with the photos provided. The Nakago may have been re-patinated to give it more age. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, PNSSHOGUN said:

It would more likely be from the Edo period, difficult to say anymore with the photos provided. The Nakago may have been re-patinated to give it more age. 

You are right I will get better pictures when possible.

thanks

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...