Jump to content

Type 95 Genuine or fake?

Recommended Posts

Almost certainly fake, I am afraid to say.  Serial number is in the wrong place and the wrong style. The shape and ending of the fuller is wrong. These swords also didn't have the drag on the end of the scabbard, nor, so far as I am aware, did they have the screw in the grip holding the hilt on, they were held simply by the screw at the top of the grip with the knot holder going through it. I believe that the serial number on these only went up to 6000. Just a few of the things things that stand out to me, but I'd be happy to be proved wrong by the other more knowledgeable members.

Whilst I am after one of these swords, I personally wouldn't want this one. Sorry.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the advice of you guys of course I did not bid on this sword but it looks like people are. Or perhaps they are fake bids, I don't know. I tried to contact Catawiki about this sword not being genuine but so far it seems I'm being ignored. That's a big negative mark for them as far as I'm concerned. https://www.catawiki.com/en/l/69994175-gunto-shin-gunto-type-95-1-steel-iijima-sword-manufacturing-co-Japan-1935-1945 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...