Jump to content

Translation help for a fuchi kashira


Mantis dude

Recommended Posts

The mei reads "Kamo-shison Sankôdô - Josui" [kaô].

賀茂氏孫山光堂 如水

 

Not sure about the "shison" (氏孫) which "should" mean "descendant" (from the Kamo family),

but the signature belongs to the female artist Josui, who was a student of Jochiku.

Shoshin or not is another question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Markus thank you! That is always the next question, is it real or not! Will be nice to research this a bit more. Interesting though that the artist is a female. I remeber reading that women did work om fittings, I think they were tasked with doing a lot of nanako? But I assume that is fairly uncommon for them to be signing artists? Always nice to learn something new. Off to try and find a bit more info. Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken, if you have the Bushido magazines, see October 1980, vol. 2, #2 for an article including images on the Murakami Jochiku school. The article does state there were a number of women involved with this school. If it turns out that this set was in fact made by one of these students, perhaps she was not fully trained in Jochiku techniques as this set is not up to Murakami standards, imho. Brian brings up a valid observation regarding nanako and ishime, although this school worked in both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I am not sure if they are a match, it is posted on my website under fuchi kashira, I actually wrote, - "Here is a nice Fuchi Kashira with mantis and plants done in shakudo and gold. Not sure they are a match fuchi is nanako and kashira is more isheme, a bit of a size difference too but the gold band on the edge look alike." So I agree with those observations. Just reading Hayne's Index of Japanese sword fittings & assoc. artisits... There is a kozuka ... the piece is marked: Sankodo josui, the granddaughter of Kamo, after a picture by Okyo. It also mentions a tsuba in Mosle that is not done in Murakami school style. So lots of questions to be researched but an interesting aside, the fact it maybe done by a women in of itself is something different. Curious how a women artist would have been viewed in those times? Any comments to that statement even how were women perceived in any of the arts vs. Men. Sort of a side issue from the validity of this piece but still both are of interest to me. Thanks for the continuing input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...