bdgrange Posted November 24, 2008 Report Posted November 24, 2008 Please take a look at these two signatures. 1. One is from the e bay listing of a piece signed "Hatori Tanto jo Yorimasa" ( now my own http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 0266830075 ) 2. Then next one from a Danny Massey listing http://www.nihontocraft.com/Sadayoshi_Katana.html 3. In John Slough's book on pg. 195 is an oshigata of one signed Hattori Tanto jo Yoriyoshi. These all display the same "Kesho" style yasurime carefully done. I read that "Hatori" was a sword shop and forge providing high quality swords for Imperial army officers during WW2. This placement indicates where they were made much the same as a province. It is also interesting to note that Sadayoshi (who became a Mukansa rated smith after the war) lived in Mishima at the Hatori address after the war. All three sig. have the same cut kanji, file marks and nakago, same location of manufacture. Even if a diff. smith working at the same forge the strokes, togare, would not be the same and these are identical. Not likely a mere coincidence. I am trying to determine what if any, was the relationship of Yorimasa with Enamoto Sadayoshi. Of course would be a real find if is a sig. used by Sadayoshi. Still well made and the "nagashi" appears the same burnished rectangle but lacking any lines? your thoughts please.................bdgrange Quote
bdgrange Posted November 26, 2008 Author Report Posted November 26, 2008 In talking to Fred Weisburg I learned that some sword groups would have a literate person, a sword signer, sign the work of each smith. So even though these sigs. style are very much similar the swords may be made by diff. smiths as the names do indicate. I like ans. my own posts, I think. Bill delagrange Quote
bdgrange Posted December 26, 2008 Author Report Posted December 26, 2008 Now it appears that Sadayoshi signed after the war Sadayoshi. During the war at the Hatori forge signing Yoriyoshi for custom order work and Yorimasa for gunto for the army. If there is such a thing. No stamps and appears traditionally made. In any event Yoshimasa fills in a gap of work done by Enamoto Sadayoshi and it then is very collectable. So say I. It is well made with fine hada, and nioi and some clusters of ara nie in the monouchi area. There are four rather neat ashi rising out of the hamon ending in a droplet. Nice balance. I refinished the saya and added a sukashi tusba that looks quite nice. happy new year Bill delagrange Quote
Brian Hancock Posted December 26, 2008 Report Posted December 26, 2008 Hi Bill, I have a sword by Amada Sadayoshi. Is he a relation of Enamoto Sadayoshi? Cheers, Brian. Quote
Brian Posted December 26, 2008 Report Posted December 26, 2008 Hi Bill, That is some interesting research there, linking the 3 mei to one smith. Would you be able to provide some sources of the info if possible? Brian Quote
bdgrange Posted December 26, 2008 Author Report Posted December 26, 2008 Another expert collector, who resided in Japan and was well aquainted with the Enomoto family, has been a resource for me. But the conclusion and connection I suggest is purely my own. Your blade Amada Sadayoshi would have been attributed to the Amada family, I believe. Enomoto Sadayoshi had two sons who have succeeded him their names are Tatsuyoshi and Sadahito. You may look on pg 155 of The New Generation of Japanese Swordsmiths for info. on Sadayoshi. It is known that Enomoto Sadayoshi worked at the Hatori forge and the family uses this site to this day. kind regards Bill delagrange Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.