Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, 

 

Here is musashino sukashi tsuba in rather poor condition.

tsuba-100.thumb.JPG.814728b14c2bbf015446aa65f4b3b945.JPG

 

tsuba-103.thumb.JPG.cee28a3fb92e0771d0b915c157db929a.JPG

tsuba-101.thumb.JPG.95375379408a73b96ad00baa4d5d8fa4.JPG

 

tsuba-102.thumb.JPG.a54d10dce7ca79e86f9c3881a8419fa2.JPG

 

 

 

There are traces of signature that look like "忠時" Tadotaki. However If you have other opinions I would be happy to hear them. 

tsuba-8.thumb.JPG.6f1423c0e6d4247136dbfc125a80b077.JPG

 

 


Making an assumption that it is Tadatoki signature I started looking at signatures of different generations to find any similarities. Only distinctive part I was able to find is the stroke circled in red.

zaznaczone.thumb.jpg.6a5feef6972ac1df658222043ccf4ad4.jpg

 

 

It starts away from the center and does not make a closed square, like in most Tadatoki signatures. I was able to find signatures of Tadatoki 5th generation with the same way of carving this part of signature (tsuba no. 46 in Akasaka Tsuba by Sano Art Museum). 

 

Design of this tsuba is also similar to no. 46. It is signed on the back side, kozuka and kogai ana are similar and  rim looks fin and delicate.

 

I wonder what are your opinions. Or is it do damaged to say anything?

 

Regards, 

Krystian 

  • Like 2
Posted

If material is lost because of corrosion, you can care as much as you like, but the MEI will not become more distinct. I would choose the way of design comparison to get closer to an assignment. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...