Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Silvio - you have played with the lighting, saturation etc of the original images. But now the images look artificial.

My suggestion is to post some natural-daylight- as well as halogen-light-illuminated images and also images of the rim and inside of the ana (holes). The workmanship is not of particularly high quality and could be Meiji repro work but there are experts here who can opine much more knowledgeably.

Posted

post-4141-0-55803000-1498903733_thumb.jpg

 

post-4141-0-83441400-1498904139_thumb.jpg

 

post-4141-0-82651400-1498904183_thumb.jpg

 

post-4141-0-82589100-1498904672_thumb.jpg

 

 

 

 

Asuming the Tsuba is a post 45 production/fake how about the Fuchi and Kashira ? as the also have a Dragon pattern

 

Thank you,

 

Silvio

 

 

Posted

I wouldn't assume they are post 45/ fake. Maybe is the lighting, maybe it have been treated with something weird, or horrorous repatination, but the tsuba seems real. Low quality production piece( casted and hand finished?) but antique. If the pics don't deceive me you can see the small brass inlay in the dragon eyes. Fuchi and kashira are real antique as well, but also low end

Posted

Thank you,

 

Maybe they Lacquered  it in the past so should this be cleaned?,the dragon eyes on both sides has brass dots.

Do you have a time era for these parts?

 

Silvio

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...