Robert S

I agree with Jean Collin. I don't see any signs of casting on the tsuba. Nice one! Robert S

Yves: Do you think that Daisho would typically have had matching menuki? I'd sort of wonder of they might not have had different but related menuki sometimes, to sort of extend the symbolism - like symbols for perseverance and for strength.

Brendan: That's crazy. What's going on with Border Control? Shortage of staff/funding? I brought a sword into Canada from Japan recently, and it took less than a day to make it through customs... and they declined to charge me duty or tax... although I suspect that may be an error, so I'm not mentioning it :-)

Keeping my hands strictly in my pockets - there are some lovely things here. Inspiration for things to make, though :-)

Mauro: I thought ko-kinko as well. It's odd that whoever put the shoami mei on it used the alternate form of the last character. Mysteries! Dale: That's great - really helps understand that shape! Robert

Having done some casting, my first instinct is that this is cast - looks like they didn't bother chasing and polishing down in the voids, where-as if it was carved all the surfaces would start with the same treatment. However, that could be just corrosion fooling me.

I had previously shared a photo of this tsuba in a post about the wakizashi I recently acquired, but I have some specific questions about it It's a copper alloy (shakudo) tsuba with a Shoami mei. Does the shape of the Nakago ana indicate that this was previously mounted on a sword worn edge down, or is there another reason for this shape? Does this work look like a Shoami piece? Is it possible that if it was converted from edge down mounting to edge up mounting, it was signed by the Shoami artisan that did the conversion? Any thoughts on the form of the "mi" character? I have seen this alternate form of the simplified character on a couple of tsuba attributed to the Iyo branch of Shoami. Thanks for all thoughts and wisdom! Robert S

Thanks again everyone for the guidance and thoughts - really helps me learning what I am seeing - it's so easy to get way off track when you know as little as I do :-) . I think I'll consider whether to get it a proper polish - I know it's probably not monetarily worth it, but it feels like it would be rewarding to see what that would bring out. I did wonder whether those nioi/ni islands in the ha would be diagnostic of a particular maker or school?

Rivkin: Thanks so much - super helpful. Does the extremely slender/light/tapered shape also suggest Mino to you? So many of the wakizashi that I see from that period seem to be much more robust.

I think I see what Christian S and Franco D mean about not sashikomi, now that I've been pointed in that direction!

Thanks so much for the really useful feedback already! Like I said, total beginner here. Anything you can tell me about what you are seeing that leads you to certain conclusions would be greatly appreciated for my learning!

I’m looking for thoughts from this expert company on a mumei wakizashi that I just purchased from Japan. I am a complete beginner in nihonto, although I have some limited background in smithing, casting, etc I picked this nihonto because it looked like it was in “working class” (if such a thing can be said about nihonto) koshirae, in the tachi style. Sugata: Nagasa – 54cm Motohaba - 29mm, Sakihaba 18mm Motgasane - 5mm, Sakigasane 3.5mm Sori - 10mm Mune – Iori-mune Kissaki is chu-kissaki, but on the o-kissaki side, with a fukura on the scarce side of medium. Blade is in a decent sashikomi polish – better than expected, but with some scratches and defects This blade appears o-suriage (tensho-suriage). Although the polish makes it look like the hamon ends in the normal way, beneath the polish it appears to continue into the nakago. If there was a mei, it was lost. Tsuba is copper, in a simple wave pattern, with the mei on the blade side. Tsuba appears to have originally been fitted to a tachi, with the nakago-ana later inverted. Tsuba mei is “Shoami”, but with an unusual variant of the simplified character for “mi”. I can’t tell if the hitsu-ana were original, or added later. Without the signature I would have called it probably ko-kinko… I wonder if it is possible that it was signed by the smith doing the conversion? Tsuba fit is quite loose. Saya appears to be wrapped with a course fabric and lacquered with possibly a vermillion lacquer, and has Ishizuki and Kashiwaba. There is no provision for a kuzuka or kogai. Fittings are all workmanlike rather than fancy. Menuki is a nice running boar (in shakudo?) As to the blade, here my extreme lack of experience means that I may be way off track. My thoughts: Jigane & Jihada Itame mixed with mokume, only visible in some areas beneath the sashikomi polish. Distinct ha-hada. No evidence of Chikei. Hamon & Boshi Hamon is gunome-midare, tending towards koshi no hiraita. Fairly bright nioiguchi, with nie in both the ha and ji, and islands of nioi/nie in the ha. One area of distinct midari utsuri, but otherwise absent or not visible. There are dark lines cutting through the nioi/nie – part of the forging structure, but not distinct kinsugi. Kissaki boshi is Notare-komi, tending toward Kaen. When and where? My wild guesses as to date/area: If this is the lower half to two thirds of a tachi, as I guess, the slender form and taper feels Heian, but the hamon more early to mid Muromachi (Oei Bizen?). I’m guessing that the sword broke, and the length remaining was only sufficient for a wakizashi length blade. Possibly the saya was also shortened, keeping the original tachi fittings. These fittings could also be bakamatsu, but the style and simplicity makes me think not, and the O-suriage appears to have occurred a long time ago, given nakago condition. I look forward to your thoughts Robert S

I think it's great that you've pulled the trigger, given that this is the blade that was calling to you. Far better a blade like that than a highly papered blade which feels blah to you. This is significantly about aesthetics, after all :-) Robert S

This is a very useful thread on several issues. Thanks for keeping it up! Robert S