John C

I'm sure this may have been answered in a different post, however I can't seem to find it. Are post war tanto required to be dated? John C.

A 10,000 dollar tanto "used for harakiri." https://www.ebay.com/itm/185365356596? 8,000 dollar tanto from the same seller https://www.ebay.com/itm/185365363553? John C.

Thank you, Piers. This explains why I was having such a hard time finding the kanji as written. And thanks again @uwe for the translation. John C.

Hello: Quality of the carving aside, would this grain pattern be indicative of ivory, bone, stone, or vegetable ivroy? Simply trying to identify the material. https://shopgoodwill.com/item/238542367 Regards, John C.

Thank you Uwe and Piers. I meant to ask about whether or not the mei is an individual or a company. I have seen many of the same style tabako ire (make-up pouch?) with this mei and fittings (broccade material, large chain hanger, manju style netsuke, Yoshiaki mei or mumei). See example below. I was curious if this were a mass produced retail piece or from a very prolific craftsman? John C.

@Bugyotsuji Piers - any idea what the second kanji could be? Attached is my kanagu, which has the same mei and a similar style as the first pictured. Regards, John C.

Hello: I was able to figure out Yoshi something but cannot get the second kanji through available resources (google app says Yoshimitsu, Tobu, or Good Luck but I don't think those are correct). The pic attached comes from Eric H. in an old thread, however I have the exact same kanagu on a tabako ire. Thank you, John C.

Steve: Left column is the army inspection mark (possibly Osaka, but not sure); the middle is the date (could be Showa 11 - 1936); right column is the size (Chu - medium). John C.

Wow, Anthony. I'm jealous. I've been looking for just one example...no wonder I can't find any! John C.

I like his straightening jigs (around 5:12). Simple and effective. John C.

The least they could have done was take their own pictures. John C.

Bruce: Kanenami??? The nami character of this mei looks similar. John C.

Mike: My Kanemoto mei is very similar to the one you are looking at. I've also included a pic of his typical hamon. I think the jury is still out re: oil vs water quenched. Mine looks mostly water quenched but one could argue oil quenched. I suspect he would be considered average for WWII smiths. John C.

Winning bid was 3,001 dollars. John C.

The stereograph pic is a street-side sword salesman during the Edo period. Just another possiblity for the disposition of collected swords. The pic is from a book called Photography in Japan found here (I apologize if this has been shared before): https://archive.org/details/photography-in-Japan-1853-1912-by-terry-bennett-z-lib.org The book has many pics of samurai who wanted a record of their kit prior to the Meiji restoration and ban on samurai/sword carrying. John C.

Emil: I have virtually the same sword but with even more difficult markings. At first glance, they looked like a punch and scratches. But on closer examination, they are triangular shaped (e.g., like a chisel) and appear to be the numbers 023. I suspect the assembly number would match numbers occasionally found on the wood scabbard insert. John C.

Thanks for the replies. 1,700 is already beyond my reach but wanted to share in case others are interested. Was wondering why someone would donate it to Goodwill if it has been recorded (i.e., discovered in the wild already). John C.

Not sure about this one. Looks good at a glance, however the details seem off (stamps are rough; chromed blade?, posibly repainted?). Already at 1,700. https://shopgoodwill.com/item/236264839 John C.

Steve: The left column should be the manufacturer (sorry, don't know the name), the middle column is the date (looks like Showa 17 [1943]), and the right column I believe is the size chu meaning medium. John C.

Thanks, Bruce. 16092 is now logged under Leo Munson. BTW, second to the oldest on file. Still seems likely only 17,000 were produced. John C.

4604 is now logged in - thank you, Conway! BTW 4604 helps to narrow down when they stopped stamping the serial number side - somewhere around 4500 would be my guess at this point. Thanks to everyone's input, I'm also getting a handle on which stamps were used and when. I've translated a couple and still working on the rest. Also, other swords from this era (including an artillery sword) have some of the same inspection marks. John C.

@BANGBANGSAN @Conway S Apologies for the late replies. Thank you both very much. Here is the latest serial number tally. I believe this may represent the most published serial numbers for the Meiji 1892 (38 as 5-12-25). 325, 487, 575, 1539, 1996, 2379, 2522, 2930, 3397, 3587, 4077, 4429, 5578, 5988, 6251, 6784, 8170, 8572, 8782, 9090, 9536, 9777, 10123, 10781, 11393, 11448, 11871, 13121, 13197, 14013, 14323, 14408, 15383, 15773, 16019, 16065, 16416, Unk serial number sold on Worthpoint. John C.

You're right. I meant to say chrome but it could be silver coated. John C.

A quick question...were there carved wood kozuka in the Edo period or are they modern tourist pieces? I've seen listings on Christie's for them, but have never been sure. Thank you for reading, John C.

The red and brown tassel is a field grade tassel (Major or Colonel); the brown and blue is a company grade (WO, captain, lieutenant). General tassels would have yellow fringe. Also, I'm not sure about the tsuba and seppa. The tsuba nakago ana does not seem the right shape and the seppa seem too shiny (aluminum perhaps?). I would wait for the opinion of others before making any final conclusions about it. John C.