Bruce Pennington

@Tyler sword Check here for what a good one looks like: Type 95 NCO Gunto - Ohmura

Mark, it would help to have shots of the full tsuka (handle), blade, blade tip, and bare nakago (tang). Oh, I see you are still adding photos!

Hi Larry! The guys have given you all the big stuff. You can learn more about these on the following sites: Naval Officers Shingunto 1937 - Ohmura and 1937 Launch of Navy Officers Gunto - Nick Komiya The thin cord tied to the haikan (belt hanger loops) has a name which I cannot remember ( @PNSSHOGUN could tell us), and is properly attached like so: or Very nice sword!

Excellent Tony, thank you! Our first "48".

Good catch, Dee! @PNSSHOGUN John would be the guy to tell you whether this was a Type 94 or 98. There was a regulation that required the dulling of blades during peacetime, but would not have impacted a blade made during WWII. By the shiny-ness of the edge, I would say someone did the dulling after WWII for their own reasons. I don't follow the gendaito and Yasukuni shrine swords, but from what Dee said, this blade would be worth a polish. Cole, value-wise, this blade is worth preserving, even polishing, but you'll wait on a wait-list for 2 years before you even get to send in the blade. If you simply want something cool to hang on the wall, this is still a good one, unpolished. Yet, if you're looking for something unmolested by post-war collectors, a return would not be out of line.

Great sword, Tony! Nice addition to the collection.

Was this mounted in WWII fittings, or with a leather cover? The hash marks are normally seen on WWII gunto, and will match stamped numbers on the rest of the fittings. Yours is a bit unusual as it looks like "5 4 10".

Personally, I just carefully use some gorilla glue or liquid steel.

I agree, never seen one like that! Custom tsuba, too

Welcome, Shaun! Now that you've dipped your toe in the Japanese sword world, do you plan to start collecting?

Sesko's list shows 21 Norimitsu using 則光. You'd have to post the full blade for evaluation on the Nihonto forum to get some speculation as to which one yours was.

Full discussion of the black painting, but the guys above have already summarized what we know

Latest one posted by @Bloodaxe924 here:

Hi Charles! I think a lot of us would appreciate seeing shots of the nakago. Is that possible? Yes, it is legit. Commonly called the Type 3 in the collector world. It was designed in 1938 and hit the streets in 1940. Didn't seem to become popular until '43/'44 and later, though, hence the impression is was late war sword. You can read all about them in these articles: Real Significance of the Type 3 - Nick Komiya, Warrelics Unveiling the Rinjiseishiki Sword in 1940 - Nick Komiya, Warrelics

Found out I have 2 of his with Showa stamps, and as with the Seki stamped blades, even these 2 mei are different! Don't know if this helps:

I have 3 on file and all 3 have different mei. One is close to this one (and is just as hard to read!) This is the other that begins with "Seki" but the mei kanji are different:

Nice, Chris, thanks!

Hi Marcin, Not out of place at all. I only have 3 of his on file, this one being one of them. I see what you mean. There is an extra stroke on the kakihan and Mitsu that are not on the other one. However, the extra stroke on the kakihan is seen on this third example, though, not on the Mitsu. He was one of the smiths that signed with another name - Teruhide. JSI has a page about him Ishido Teruhide; Japaneseswordindex.com, with some mei for comparison. In this case, though, the kaigunto comes with a nice kamon, and has a stamped number - 20 - on the mune as does his other blades on file. So, I'd write this one off as a student mei cutter, or a rush job, or a bad Monday after a fun weekend. It also is made worse looking because of the poor powder job from the seller.

Interesting Tony! My light-weight gunto has a chrome plated blade as well and has a fuller, though the kissaki is standard shape.

I saw that, too, but realized that it is the shop we are recognizing. The shop would easily have gotten blades made by different smiths/forges.

Anyone look at current asking prices for Type 95s? Just scanned ebay and they are going through the roof! $1,200 is the low end with several above $1,500 up to $2,200 USD!!!! Sure, that is asking price and the actual sale may go lower, but my point is the asking prices are way up.

Difference in fittings could be due to customer requests? Note the same late-war coating under the ito, instead of same':

Maybe a self-portrait? Ha! Seriously, Jim, that's a great looking habaki! Thanks for posting.

Said to be true gendaito, though each blade must be considered on it's own. Also popular among many collectors because of his unique story.

You can see the kanji on this page: Dating Japanese Swords - Japaneseswordindex.com