Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all

 

back to this beloved forum :D

 

recently, a friend of mine come with and offer for "short samurai sword from WW2 era" ... my first thought was it must be a fake but nonetheless I asked him to send couple of picture for identification

 

and what come along next puzzled me ...

 

this is the first picture I got

dntffr2s.jpg

 

you can see that it is in proper gunto mounting, but SHORT ... no menuki seen, and the scabbard seems not original gunto (or shortened one)

 

more pictures followed, and I got more and more puzzled ...

check out the fittings below, I think it is original

 

dimension (I asked him to take pictures with scale, so we may know the length)

fr8ysoiu.jpg

 

tsuba with chuha still intact

pfnvx289.jpg

 

tsuba (typical shin gunto I think)

dh1jh0vd.jpg

 

this is the end of scabbard, of which I believe we should see an ishizuki (scabbard tip), but it ended up abruptly ... yet we can still see semegane in shin gunto style

sirqdmdq.jpg

 

this is the kabutogane, of which seemed originally comes from ishizuki (scabbard cap) ... and forced into being a kabutogane :D

g7fxed8a.jpg

 

haikan is correct double flowering cherry as per shin gunto mounting

3nj6n2xz.jpg

 

the fittings ... no menuki, so I assume perhaps someone once opened and re-wrapped the tsuka (and he did a poor job)

8pdptdco.jpg

 

habaki and part of the blade ... honestly, the blade looked dead to me ... dunno whether it can be restored

dfflskzz.jpg

 

view of the blade

I think sugata is good, typical of wakizashi -and somehow mounted into gunto mount

tjlbmv3d.jpg

 

last one ... nakago seems in proper shape ... and there's MEI ... this is why I brought this up to this forum - as I think this is an authentic mei with aged rust

vhtx3avo.jpg

 

so ... what do you think ??

is it a real deal ?? or a fake ?? just as information, this one offered to me with USD 1,000 price tag

 

note that I do not wish to buy this sword, I just think that this is interesting and uncommon object, and the only reference I got is from http://www.h4.dion.ne.jp/~t-ohmura/gunto_048.htm

which mentioned it as crew gunto ... but to see such interesting object in Indonesia is such a thrill, I found a gendaito, mantetsuto and now crew gunto ??

 

any comment is very much appreciated :D

thank you & regards

Donny

Posted

sword is "put together", the fitting on the end of the handle belongs on the end of a scabbard. hard to say if it was done recently or in 1946 but i would think it is recent. the blade is antique

Posted

Hi Mark

 

I also noticed that the ishizuki is indeed forced into being a kabutogane

 

here in Indonesia, we cannot easily reproduce fittings like that, so most likely this sword was found in poor condition, without kabutogane, and tsuka ito, and then the owner tried some kind of plastic surgery to make the sword intact, by adding up his own shoelace as ito and plug the ishizuki into the end of tsuka ... and by doing so, he ruined the saya

 

enough talking about the fittings ...

 

so ... do you think the blade is authentic ? is it restorable ??

Posted

Hi Donny

 

Before we go off on a tangent trying to identify this blade, can we have a pic of the ha machi mune machi area please? From the photo we have, that area looks quite strange.

Posted
Hi Donny

 

Before we go off on a tangent trying to identify this blade, can we have a pic of the ha machi mune machi area please? From the photo we have, that area looks quite strange.

 

Hi Keith

will ask the owner for the pic asap

:D

Posted
You should be able to decipher it as it is the most common signature of sue Bizen

 

 

Bizen Kuni Ju Osafune Sukesada

 

I admit that I am being lazy at this moment :D

thank you very much, Jean ...

 

and if I'm not mistaken, Osafune Sukesada is working in Bizen around 1500 CE, on sengoku era, right ??

and if so, do you think this wakizashi is a "mass produced" blade produced during that era ??

Posted
The nakago almost looks like it was welded on ?

 

no ... I believe this is original blade, as the Indonesian has no knowledge of Japanese sword, and too many details on the blade to be called a forgery. I seriously think that this blade is going through acid treatment, as Indonesians do with their krisses (traditional daggers) ...

 

Indonesian believe in "myths" and "magic" and many believed that their daggers, and also sword (including Japanese swords left by IJA troops on WW2), are possessing some kind of spirit within it, and thus needs to be "treated" and "maintained" ...

 

unfortunately, the way Indonesian treated their blade is using mixture of tamarind and lemon, while the blade is soaked and washed in coconut water first, then they add arsenic powder ... in time, this will transform the blade into stone-like, and this what I see in the wakizashi above.

 

and sadly this practice is a disaster for a Japanese sword ... as you see the blade is "dead" already ...

 

considering the niku is pretty thin, I am in serious doubt that this blade is restorable, but still it is an interesting piece of Japan history which stranded in Indonesia :D

Posted
Long long time ago, it could have been something nice but we'll never know :cry:

 

well ... I tried to make and offer, in light that this sword will help me learn about traditional polishing method ... but I doubt that the seller will consider my offer of USD 125 :D

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...