Jon D Posted Thursday at 05:18 AM Report Posted Thursday at 05:18 AM (edited) Hi Everyone, I was told that it was a bring back. Paid enough to be frustrated if it is a fake. Edited Thursday at 05:23 AM by Jon D Quote
Tcat Posted Thursday at 05:31 AM Report Posted Thursday at 05:31 AM The blade is signed 伊賀守金道作 / Iga no kami kinmichi saku. It is a genuine Japanese sword, but I can't confirm if the signature is genuine. Quote
Jon D Posted Thursday at 05:36 AM Author Report Posted Thursday at 05:36 AM Thank you so much Tcat! I really appreciate it. Does not sound like a world war 2 era smith. Quote
Tcat Posted Thursday at 05:45 AM Report Posted Thursday at 05:45 AM Indeed it wasnt, it was a prestigious name school of swordmaking, so unfortunately we have to expect there to be plenty of questionable signatures out there. Quote
robinalexander Posted Thursday at 06:55 AM Report Posted Thursday at 06:55 AM Bearing in mind Jon that the presence of the Ashi and leather combat cover would indicate it saw service in WW2. More likely than not. Many civilian swords were pressed into service by choice or necessity due to material shortages. 1 Quote
Jon D Posted Thursday at 07:06 AM Author Report Posted Thursday at 07:06 AM That makes sense! It definitely does not have the traditional gunto fittings. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted Thursday at 02:20 PM Report Posted Thursday at 02:20 PM We see many swords with colored cords, yellow seemed popular, from the war. We don't know the exact reason for them. Possibly something for good luck, or warding off evil spirits. Sometimes they are clearly cords from sword bags, but yours is not. You can see several other examples here: 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.