Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello everyone. I bought this sword at a yard sale. My first thought was that it was a fake because the tsuka and saya are obvious fakes. But when I looked at it, I could tell the tsuka and saya were not made for the blade. When I examined the blade, it looked to be authentic. It has two mekugiana and the nakago has great patina. It also has some fukure which means it must be traditionally made. But I have some questions about it as well. It doesn’t have much (if any) shinogi and there is no yokote that I can tell. I think it has a sugua or hoso-suga hamon but it’s hard to tell. What do you guys think? Can anyone tell me how old it is or who could have made it? 

IMG_0150.jpeg

IMG_0151.jpeg

IMG_0153.jpeg

IMG_0154.jpeg

IMG_0156.jpeg

IMG_0161.jpeg

IMG_0162.jpeg

Posted

Traditionally made yes.. but buffing wheel'ed to hell. I am not sure if there's even enough meat on the boshi for it to be salvageable. 

Posted

Shinto [so-called kanbun-shinto with minimal sori] or end of edo [bakumatsu/longer blades. How long is nagasa? Dunno if marked kizu is kirikomi.

Sori-Feature.png

Posted

@Rawa it could be Shinto. The blade does feel heavier than the koto blades I’ve held. The nagasa is between 25 inches and 26 inches. It’s hard to tell since it doesn’t have a habaki 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...