Bugyotsuji Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 Hello everyone, May I ask if the reading of this Mei is correct? The registration card says 二王 寛清 (which seems to be Nio Hirokiyo. Also listed in the Meikan as such.). I accept that is is not very well written, but is there any other possible reading of Kan/Hiro? Notice the legs of 見, being more like 貝. Acceptable? This Kanji was also used in the age/period 寛正 Kansho (1460-65) before Onin/Bunmei. Thank you 🙏 Quote
Nobody Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 I think that the mei might be 實清 - Sanekiyo. 2 Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted February 8, 2021 Author Report Posted February 8, 2021 Moriyama San, that is interesting. Thank you very much for this possibility. There were two Nio Sanekiyo, in Eisho 永正 1504~ and 元亀 1570~. I understand that we cannot be 100% sure, but if the registration certificate is mistaken, that has opened another door for me. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.