Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Okay we all know that there is a lot of talk concerning papers on here, and that some swords are attributed to one smith or another...

 

Now.......

 

A Smith in 1579 makes great swords... he makes a daisho for a Samurai and the Samurai takes really good care of them....

 

centuries later, the Daisho is split up somehow and the Katana goes to Shinsa.. it gets tokubetsu hozon, or even Juyo rating....

 

The Wakizashi is years later submitted to Shinsa somewhere else...

 

It gets a Gimei qualification... and a pink slip

 

What no one knew...

 

Was the fact the Smith after a night of heavy sake drinking was feeling rather sickly.. hence when signing the wakizashi the carving showed a lot of mistakes......

 

So arent we all attesting too much value on Papers in stead of admiring the swords for what they really are...? beautiful works of art?

 

I mean, i could imagine submitting a sword to two different shinsa and getting two different opinions.......

 

;)

 

 

KM

Posted

Actually, getting different attributions and even shoshin/gimei is rather

common when submitting a sword to different shinsa groups. One reason

I don't do it. An opinion is still just an opinion. Writing that opinion on a

piece of paper doesn't make it a fact.

 

Rich S

Posted

I agree very much with Rich that a paper is just another opinion, albeit a very learned one and there are certainly many stories of swords being submitted to different groups or even the same group at different times and coming back with different attributions.

However coming back to your first point it sort of implies that the attribution is based purely on the mei. In fact the mei is (from what I have seen at the UK shinsas) the last thing looked at. As has been said often here before, the mei should confirm the opinion made based on the workmanship. Having said that I have seen swords made by top rated smiths (a recent Rai Kunitoshi springs to mind) where the workmanship was extremely pedestrian, so I have no doubt they produced "monday morning" work like the rest of us mortals.

To confirm points made before:

1. You should buy the sword not the paper.

2. The main benefit of papers from one of the main shinsa groups is that it confirms a level of condition when buying a blade unseen over distance.

3. When buying a famous name there is no doubt I would be more confident in parting with cash for a blade that had been passed by an expert shinsa panel than not.

 

We can go on at infinitem about how valuable papers are or are not and it is up to the indvidual how much credence he/she places on them. There is no doubt however that having papers is of commercial benefit if nothing else.

Posted

Well, that's not a problem concerning Nihonto only, but works of art in general. Just remember the many paintings that were attributed to Rembrandt until a few years ago and are now regarded as works by his pupils (the man with the golden helmet being the most prominent example). Attributions are not based on the inscriptions only, but mostly on style etc., but in most cases they are still opinions and opinions can, of course, vary.

Posted

Hi,

 

A Smith in 1579 makes great swords... he makes a daisho for a Samurai and the Samurai takes really good care of them....

 

centuries later, the Daisho is split up somehow and the Katana goes to Shinsa.. it gets tokubetsu hozon, or even Juyo rating....

 

The Wakizashi is years later submitted to Shinsa somewhere else...

 

It gets a Gimei qualification... and a pink slip

 

 

Nice story but it smells a legend perfume. :glee:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...