Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

 

I have the following blade - i wondered what you thought about identification, authenticity and what to do next - is it worth polishing?

 

It looks like its signed by 豊後住藤原統景 bungo ju fujiwara munekage

 

but its missing the province of Bungo - in fact theres only a signature and no date either (should i be worried by this?)

 

The hamon is suguha (hope i have that right) but its quite dull - the blade is incredibly sharp all the way down to the hamachi, the blade and the nagako is the same profile shape as the blade, rather than being flat like those found on gunto's - it certainly feels like it should be traditionally made rather than anything else

 

The blade itself if 28 inches (71cm) and overall is 35 inches (89cm)

 

The blade itself looks quite scratched up and i can see no obvious hada - in some parts it does look like small bits of mokume-hada, which would be the closest pattern i could think of - but this may just be staining on the blade or some other agent

 

I'd certainly like you opinion on its authenticity and what to do next with it - it originally came in late gunto mounts

 

thanks in advance

 

David

 

 

25880589672_3720f8f10a_o.jpg

 

 

 

25701095190_7f99fc52a6_o.jpg

 

 

 

 

25880402502_e942bc8b7d_o.jpg

 

 

 

<---Mune side ------    hamon side---->

 

B2A9708.jpg

 

<---Mune side ------    hamon side---->

 

B2A9708-2.jpg

 

 

 

25700637270_fe25ecb8ab_o.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

The signature is fine. 高田住藤原統景 (Takada-jū Fujiwara Munekage). 

 

The sword looks OK to me. Nothing fabulous. In need of a polish, but unfortunately the polishing may cost more than the finished product is worth on the open market. 

 

How do you take such awesome pictures, by the way? 

 

Edit: Here is one in a better state of polish

http://sinogi.dee.cc/katarogu/1801/munekage-k269078/k269078.htm

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi Steve

 

Thanks for the reply - I wasn't expecting the earth, i since realised bungo swords aren't the most desired -  but relieved it looks OK at least!

 

The pics were taken on a Canon 5Ds using a 24-70 and 100-400 lens, a tripod and a continuous lighting softbox - the 5DS gives unbelievable resolution but any modern camera would do - i think the trick is probably more diffused lighting through the softbox and a tripod to remove any wobbles/blur - both cheap and probably add much more quality to the shot than any camera/lens

 

Regards

Dave

  • Like 3
Posted

Hi David,

I think you would be smart to put off having this polished.  Spend money, time, and effort on educating yourself about Nihonto.  Someday you may decide to have this sword polished and if so that's fine.  But maybe by then you will have chosen a different time/school to focus your collection on and you'll be glad you don't have so much money tied up in this sword.  At the moment you don't know enough to know what you want; go slow grasshopper.

Grey

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks Grey

 

Understood - it was mostly purchased due to its connection to the WW2 Burma campaign - the fact it is older is a bonus. Understand what you are saying about polish -  i think i'll just keep it oiled and in its current state. Certainly learning more about other schools seems a good idea before going any further

 

Regards

David

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...