Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was recently offered this but my guy is telling me to run as fast as I can. Additional opinions would be greatly appreciated. My analysis:

 

Habaki doesn't look right

As far as I can tell nakago looks okay, don't like where it was drilled

Haven't seen just a stainless scabbard or one where it was rubbed to look like this

Handle & tsuba look okay

 

Thanks,

Brandon

post-4282-14196863473144_thumb.jpg

post-4282-14196863476564_thumb.jpg

post-4282-14196863481114_thumb.jpg

post-4282-14196863484464_thumb.jpg

Posted
Run, don't walk.

 

Haha, the more I look at it, the more I don't like it. Gut has said run like hell since the beginning but the handle, and Nakago at first, were throwing me off. I'm glad I have you guys here to prevent me from making mistakes when I get excited over something. Oh, and the parts of the blade I did see were very representative of the Chinese copies.

 

Thanks,

Brandon

Posted

The mounts look good to me, but the blade is......odd.

And the curve of that saya :?: :!:

Agree that it looks chromed later...seen that before. Would like to see the machi under the habaki. Either way, there will not be good news on this one. Even if it turned out to be original...it would be a bad one.

 

Brian

Posted

The saya was bent to accommodate the 'aftermarket' blade which is also why the mekugi-ana seem misplaced on the nakago. The 'chrome' effect on the saya is due to the paint breaking off when they bent it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...