First of all you are suggesting that every Japanese soldier descended from a samurai family and had some "family relic" at hand. This is sheer nonsense of course, but it is in perfect accordance with the militaristic doctrine of that time. Sons of peasants and kulis were told: "We are all samurai". This was just propaganda and it will probably take some more time to get this crap out all heads, especially the smaller ones.
Even many of the subaltern officers who had to carry swords were not of samurai origin. They had to get their swords and mountings from elsewhere.
Secondly, the use of swords as weapons plays a minor role during WWII (politely said).
Thirdly and most important: Japan's ideology during WWII was not a continuation of samurai-culture, but its perversion in the first degree.
reinhard
I said Japanese and not samurai for a reason..but regardless a Japanese sword being converted to a ww2 sword gives the sword to SOME people a certain amount of historical significance and is part of the swords history. When a sword which sat unused and stored away got refitted for war it again becomes a weapon instead of a memento even if the sword never actually got used as a weapon. Swords made during the was should also have the ww2 fittings kept with the sword even if the blade is refitted to suit the new owner. Just my personal belief...I acknowledge that there is still a considerable amount of hostility towards the Japanese by some collectors who admire the object but do not want to think about its origin...The Japanese ww2 ideology was sadly just a reflection of the American and European ideology that they had observed first in their part of the world..but thats another debate.