George KN

Hi Susan/@Millers1257, welcome to the forum! Just to clarify what others have suggested, this looks to be a real Japanese blade, likely hundreds of years old. It 100% needs treating with care, so please don't attempt to clean the blade, even though it seems in rough shape, as you may damage it further (for example, cleaning the rust off the nagako/tang can drastically reduce a sword's value as it is a key way to tell it's age). In terms of price, these swords can have quite a large range - from a few hundred dollars, to tens of thousands. It all comes down to the smith, the quality and aesthetics of the blade, as well as its condition and any flaws it has. Even a sword's tsuba/guard or other fittings can command quite a high valuation on their own, or be near valueless. It all depends. There's so much nuance in the field it's hard to properly summarise. Smith signatures are often faked (called gimei), and even a near-invisible hairline crack in part of the blade could render it fatally flawed (though this depends on where the crack is). As Dan suggested, this really should be seen by a collector or expert in person, or else you risk potentially underselling the sword without knowing it's true value or history.

I've got to say, this is a really smart looking site! Super useful, thank you

Hi Forrest, welcome to the forum! Unfortunately I have to agree with everyone else, this does look like either a homemade blade, or one built to intentionally deceive. Quite a few of us started the same way, buying a fake and then getting introduced to the world of Nihonto and wartime blades the hard way, do so don't give up hope - they are out there! Hopefully you didn't pay too much for it... I'd heavily advise reading up on as many threads in the forum as you can - you'll be able to train your eye pretty quickly about what a type 95 or type 98 etc should look like. Also, did you remove the tsuka wrap? Hopefully not something you'd do on a real ww2 relic 😅

Just being the devils advocate, as I suspect this may have been prompted by a few specific posts I haven't read yet, but imposing restrictions on new members specifically would likely limit the first time buyer > enthusiastic novice > actually learning about nihonto > later being able to contribute in return pipeline. Speaking from my own experience, if I hadn't been able to post pre-auction questions when I was starting out, I'd not only have a tonne of rubbish swords, but I probably wouldn't have been compelled to get membership later. I don't understand why people don't say please or thank you though

Hi Charles, from what I can see, it looks good! It definitely would be worth taking some of your own photos when possible (or uploading the originals), as it is very hard to see the flaws or features properly, since we can't zoom in on your screenshots of the images in the same way you can with the originals. But in my books you can't really go wrong with a wartime mounted nihonto, they are all worth saving! Some interesting things I can spot from your current photos: 1. I can't seem to see a distinct yokote, and the kissaki seems a strange shape, so I wonder if it has been reshaped recently (possibly by an amateur? (Could just be the angle of the camera and blade though)) 2. There seems to be a lot of space between the tsuka and the habaki. If this is the case, and it isn't just caused by the damage, it might suggest the tsuba has been swapped out at some point recently? 3. The two piece habaki has a lot of damage to it! Although the rest of the sword doesn't look too roughed up (unlike a lot of WW2 blades I see in UK auctions), this habaki really does look like its been through a warzone 4. Looks like a good length, and nothing wrong with it being mumei (I actually like mumei a lot, means you have to evaluate a blade only on its merits) 5. The lack of menuki and general lack of decoration suggest to me it could have been drafted into service in a hurry, very much functional rather than decorative

If we're making an everything-Emura thread, here is what Sesko's Swordsmiths A-Z has on him (hopefully nobody will mind me copy pasting - I highly recommend buying the pdf, it's great for this!): One thing I have noticed with Emura though, not just in this thread, but in my own research too, is just how beat up most of the examples are. Pics of mine when when I first got it can be found here, but most of the ones in this thread are scratched badly too. I also find it interesting that a lot of examples have silvered habaki. Unsure I'm able to extrapolate anything from this yet, but it's fun comparing and contrasting with other surviving blades.

It's an interesting theory, mine is also tachi;

Is it in the steel, or kind of on it? Its shape makes me think it might have been lying on a cloth or pillow (that may have had grease or something acidic on?).

Not qualified to provide information, but I personally really like the hamon! The nakago is interesting too. While I agree the lowest ana looks cleaner and more recent, could it be suriage? And if it is suriage, wouldn't that suggest the mei is a later addition? I also echo Brian's sentiment - sorry to hear about your friend. I completely understand about wanting to do a full restoration (it at the very least deserves a shirasaya!).

Noticed this earlier today whilst browsing during work. Thanks for fixing so quickly!

Yup, super fake - and I echo Charles's thoughts on the UK auctions being full of them! Technically, I believe these fake swords are actually illegal under UK law now to possess and sell too - but it's probably not worth pointing this out to the auctions themselves because they likely already know this, and in my mind it's better than them actually stopping selling any curved blades which I think would be the alternative, because there isn't really a way for an auction house to formally know/guarantee whether one is real or not. If the auctions begin requiring written proof/certificates for genuine nihonto to be sold UK collectors really will be toast...

I like shinto blades though But serious counterpoint, nihonto aren't just weapons - they have both historic and artistic value too. (Limited doesn't mean none?) Imagine what all previous owners of that blade would think of us intentionally destroying them... We can surely do better than that? They say a person dies twice - once with their own body, and then next when the last person that remembers them eventually dies. Make sure that second death is a long time off - go give a blade to some young adult that couldn't dream of affording them, sparking an interest in them for life. This is a forum for the preservation of Japanese swords right? 😅

Fascinating thread, and I realise it's very emotionally charged (not least because of some of the friction/culture on this forum) - but please don't do this A single example of this would make it *really* hard for us to argue that people shouldn't use belt sanders or try amateur restoration on their rusty nihonto. We are temporary custodians are we not? For these swords to be here today they have already had to pass through multiple generations. It seems such a shame to break that chain! On a personal level, I 100% understand wanting to be buried with the items I hold most dear. But please, do consider how letting them go to new owners helps continue your own legacy, albeit in a smaller (but considerably less final) way.

I watched the video, but I didn't see any evidence apart from his own opinion that the longer type of mei actually differentiated between Emura and his students? Also, how much did that sword sell for?

It's long over due since I realised the insane value of this forum even a few months in to collecting, but I've just paid for gold membership now after seeing this thread Monetisation-wise, I was really surprised that selling things here is available for free members. In fact, as a buyer, it provides a bit more confidence to know that a seller is a gold member since it means at the very least the forum has a card or some other information on the seller which should help discourage fraud. Not sure about monetising translations though, as it might feel then that the users that take the time to do translations then become a financial commodity, and there would be little stopping people from messaging those regular translators directly / going off forum for information Something I've seen a lot of in other niche online communities that may apply here: Additional donation tiers - people can pay more just because they want to support the forum more. Maybe give them a cool badge, but even without perks you may be surprised that some people will pick this option Paying monthly for donations - it may be a barrier to entry that people need to pick 6 or 12 months of membership - I know it's cheaper to pay in a lump sum, but younger people especially are much more acclimatised to regular payments they can turn on or off Branded merch / Secondary sales (someone else mentioned this too) Unsure the NMB logo particularly lends itself at the moment as a brand, but I don't think anyone would mind if the forum began selling some useful essentials like tsuba boxes, sword stands, or microfibre cloths Amazon referral links for relevant books Discount codes/partnerships with certain stores In general though, more regular users = more paid subscribers. From an SEO point of view the Google results the NMB has always been super high in the search list whenever I use collecting terms ("nihonto", "Emura", "Nakago"), it does this really well! But I do wonder whether it isn't so great when a complete novice is looking up "Original Samurai Swords, what do they look like", so a bunch of people may never find us here. We might benefit from a beginner friendly page or two with a proper introduction to the subject, that isn't part of the forum itself, similar-ish to the FAQ page, but which would show up in such search results? Even a completely separate website that addresses these common issues and links specifically to the NMB for further information would help (a bit like the https://japaneseswordindex.com/nihonto.htm but more modern and mobile friendly).