John C

Hello: According to google app, the phrase is "framed inscription." As to general info on origami, here is a good reference: http://www.nihontocr...se_sword_papers.html John C.

If it is Nihonto you are interested in, a good and reasonable jumping off point would be The Connoisseur's Book of Japanese Swords (currently 47.75 USD on Amazon). https://www.amazon.c...Swords/dp/1568365810 This book will give you a good overview of the different schools, hamon, hada, etc. John C.

Has this been posted before? Note the bohi is cut correctly, however... https://www.ebay.com/itm/404570728906?hash=item5e324b69ca:g:hSgAAOSwutNlOCRI&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAA4GxONsz2BNSqFK0i9CJoVwADl8lBLhdjwJvBeazvW%2FKlrzxe3wejxQKP5AKkNbOX7QoC8IE2OBLY6zrvR4GghmoJAOH0dXmFzw2G1zwKfEUbjR9U6bmA4kTqQPhivhPdlsl%2FHFO0wfydGpJumc2MjnFyb3NkaIrIISSQLFedgU0gU%2F51Put%2B2PEFen160gRWUjHDzQrQOzmSezQd5uiP6Buk5hb%2F1%2BpHV6Az23Uc2v1i8%2BJCnF9Lrv8Q42vFxzZ7Jscmc6ThXTKNQiXuGHpvw%2BIFlZUOX%2FllRJbusCGZv4xN|tkp%3ABk9SR4DliNKeYw John C.

As far as a "fake" kaigunto, not sure I have seen one (though I am sure others have). But look at the differences between an actual kaigunto and souvenir swords that are VERY often passed off as original kaigunto. In addition, there are differences between iron tsuba. They look similar, however the souvenir version is larger than the type 3 version; whereas the kaigunto has rays on it. John C.

John C.

Also, while the blade is probably older than WW2, the shirasaya is of the style and type that would have been produced and carried in WW2. So possibly someone carrying an older blade during WW2. Below is a pic of one with a war-time blade. John C.

Thank you for your research. I am assuming mine is not old, however I was hoping to get as close as early or late whatever century. John C.

Thank you both for responding. I was hoping to take a crack at dating the blade using a kantei method, however there is not a lot of info out there pertaining specifically to yari. Jussi, here is a pick, though it may not be much help. Based on the kerakubi, it's not very old Nagasa: 4.5 inches Overall: ~14.5 inches John C.

I recently acquired a yari blade in shirasaya and was wondering if it could be roughly dated using kantei? Are yari styles indicative of a certain period or are the various styles too ubiquitous to determine age? Thank you, John C.

Okay so I'm a nerd. But here is a page from a book on knots talking about the cockscomb style knot work. John C.

Looks like the name is trying to be Yamamoto. But I suspect not THE Yamamoto. John C.

Haven't seen them before, however seems like the spring clip breaks easily so it makes sense. Here is one for sale. John C.

The mounts appear to be Rinji Seishiki (sometimes referred to as type 3). These will generally have two mekugi (bamboo pins). Removing the tsuka is the same as other showato but with two pins. In addition, many of these came with traditionally made blades (gendaito) so it's worth a look at the nakago. John C.

John: I don't think that red tassel is original to that sword. You could probably carefully remove it if you want the sword in a more original condition. The tassel would have most likely looked like the one below (blue and brown for company officer grade or red and brown for field grade). John C.

Matt: Would you be able to measure both the length and width of each tsuka (handle)? I think the comparison would be useful for future reference on the fake type 95 thread. John C.

Thank you. As a follow-up, is there any way to tell an approximate age based on style/size or did the various styles run the gamut of periods? It seems to be very nicely made with nie along the temper line and is in decent polish. Nakago is a dark rust so I'm thinking not too new. Early meiji perhaps? John C.

Are there any written or stamped marks on the wooden inserts? May indicate the shop where it was made. John C.

Reviving an old discussion about yari. Matt: Noticed you have an extensive collection and I have a question about a yari in shirasaya I just picked up. Based on the previous discussion and your experience, would you consider this a kago yari, uchine, or something else? I ask because it is quite small - ha is 4.5 inches and overall about 14.5 inches. Regards, John C.

Both are excellent, however very different. Just an FYI that Dawson is great for military swords while Connoisseur's is great for learning how to interpret the hamon, hada, etc, of various schools - lots of oshigata. So, Dawsons for military and Connoisseur's for Nihonto. Personally, I would stick to a specific genre of sword, be it military, shin-shinto, or whatever, and focus on that for a while. Then if your interests change, you can move on to something else. John C.

The title and pictures of the auction are pulled word-for-word directly from the original auction. It seems all they are doing is changing the price to half off and saying "11 available". John C.

I agree. My Nobuyoshi is papered without distinction, however the exact wording of the mei was not used by 1st Gen so my assumption is second gen. In addition the quality of second gen seems lower than 1st gen and far below 3rd Gen (Echizen). John C.

Came across this today - a website selling komongo and sohei-swords (Matt) stuff at half price. I confirmed with Matt this is not authorized by him. Probably using his auction information without permission. https://shoplazza.ru/product/225937909880 Sorry if this has been covered before but just came across it. John C.

It does have the star stamp just above the mekugi-ana. John C.

The assembly numbers are 2779, however there is another character above the Japanese numbers. Is that a zero or katakana? John C.

Would the pierced tsuba be type 94 or type 98? From the description: "This is an original Japanese army officer’s sword in Shin Gunto mountings from World War 2." John C.