Mark S.

Point taken... and my point made. Congrats Mark S.

And there it is... only ten posts in and this extremely interesting discussion "jumps the shark". Now we get to watch it devolve into personal attacks and defense of personal positions rather than an extremely interesting discussion of the original subject. Why does this hurt so much!?! Mark S. (sorry forgot to sign)

Not trying to be vague or difficult, just didn't have a lot of time to post last time. Hopefully this might help? Mark

Probably should have been more specific - I was comparing item 09172 to 08710. Mark S.

Just to highlight this topic. AOI has two Tadahiro (I assume same smith by their description) blades currently for sale. When I compared the signatures side by side, there are some differences that to a complete novice (ME) look like some of the same differences that are discussed on this board for reasons to question whether it is the same smith or gimei, etc. For example, the first character in the mei seems very different and the last two characters have minor differences. Not questioning AOI in any way! Just trying to learn and I thought it was timely that two swords by the same smith were available for discussion. Just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on these mei's and their differences. Mark S.

Thank you both. I should have mentioned that only a short drive is required - no flying. Mark S.

Does anyone have any recommendations for transporting/carrying unmounted blades to a sword show? With the upcoming Chicago show, I may be bringing two unmounted blades for opinions/education. One is a WW2 era blade (I asked a few questions about this blade on this forum a couple of months ago) and the other is probably also a WW2 blade, although it might be a bit older. What would be the best / easiest / SAFEST way to transport the blades and carry them at the show, while also making them easy to show interested individuals. Thanks in advance, Mark S.

Brian, I just wanted to follow up and say "thank you". I'll blame the holidays for my lack of courtesy. Unfortunately, I am not experienced enough to know if what I am looking at is truly nie. Luckily, this is not my blade, so I am not emotionally (or financially) tied to it. I just thought it was a little interesting as I had not seen this hamon pattern on what I have typically observed on WW2 blades - although my experience is EXTREMELY limited - and I realize a hamon by itself is not enough to judge a blade. Mark S.

Gordon, Thank you for your time and information. While searching many of the on-line sites, I was not able to find any other info on this smith, and I could not find any other blades with this specific hamon pattern. I appreciate your sharing what you know. Mark S.

Mei

Close-up of Hamon

Blade

Hello, This is my first post here, although I have been “lurking†(learning) here for some time. The reason for this first post is that I was lucky enough to inspect a sword that a friend has in his possession. Usual story - grandfather brought a couple swords home after WW2 and they have been “sitting in a closet†since. After inspecting the sword, I am (of course) left with more questions than answers and would like to hear if anyone has any info to add. I apologize up front for any mistakes, misspellings, or misuse of terms. General information: Nagasa: 67.3 cm Sori: 1.3 cm Mounted in typical WW2 Army Gunto mount Please see attached photos (sorry about the quality, but I’m learning and did not have the sword for a long period of time). While I tried to translate the Mei on my own, I only got a partial translation before asking for assistance. With the help I received, I believe the Mei translates to Unjosai Katsunaga. After looking at Richard Stein’s Japanese Sword Guide, I found that the name is on the list of “undocumented WW2 Swordsmithsâ€. There are no other factory stamps or any date information on the reverse side. Does anyone have any more information about this smith or own a sword by this maker? Also, I am interested in the hamon. I’m not quite sure how to refer to it. The hamon seems to alternate between suguha (straight) and ??????. Each “raised†area has 4 distinct “lobes†that have an almost mirror-like appearance as opposed to the more “milky†hamon. The attached pictures show this a little more clearly than I can explain (I hope). What would be the proper terminology for this type of hamon? Do you have an opinion as to oil vs. water temper? Machine vs. hand-made? Can’t see too much activity in the blade. I attribute this to one of three factors. 1) It’s not there, 2) state of polish hides it, or 3) I can’t see it / don’t know what I am looking at. I am leaning toward #3. Thank you in advance. I’m happy to be here, and looking forward to learning a lot more. Mark S.