Jump to content

Jacques

Members
  • Posts

    4,962
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Jacques

  1. Chu jo saku. Bungo Takada is considered a minor school due to the absence of top-level artists.
  2. The subject is so vast that it's difficult to answer; among other things, the quality of a steel and a hada are things you need to know how to evaluate. For example, it's possible for a trained eye to tell whether a sword is Koto or Shinto just by the look of the steel.
  3. It is more relevant to judge a smith on the basis of his entire career than to judge one or another sword. The subtlety lies in knowing which are the best works of a particular smith, which the vast majority of collectors can't do.
  4. I'ts the sandai Osaka Yoshimichi, at first glance the mei looks legit.
  5. Franco It's not enough to say a polisher can do this - you have to prove it. Facts are facts words are only words... And many naginata naoshi are not true naginata naoshi but only made in the style...
  6. The problem is that you can't say the polisher knows if you don't know the process. And yes, the scientific method can be applied anywhere.
  7. Jacques

    Cutting hi

    Cutting hi
  8. This sword has obviously undergone a lot of polishing since it was suriage. Don't forget that the thickening stone hasn't yet been invented, and further polishing could lead to an even worse situation.
  9. Stay serious
  10. Detecting a gimei is much harder than you think. You need to start by taking into account the smith's entire career This one is tokubetsu hozon (dots on Kane are in the same way than on yours)
  11. Cheap, in 2007, a saber belonging to Napoleon Bonaparte was sold for the modest sum of €4800,000.
  12. Why? I'm not materialistic, nor am I interested in money. Once I've studied one sword, it no longer interests me; i study another one, and so on. I'm lucky enough to have the memory of an elephant, which enables me to remember the essential characteristics of the swords I've studied. In fact, there are only 300 smiths I'm interested in: jo, jo-jo and sai-jo saku.
  13. Jussi https://kunishitei.bunka.go.jp/heritage/detail/201/6524 It's not the same; the one i shared has a 74.2 nagasa and a 0.9 cm sori
  14. Except that I never mentioned nagamaki... You're putting words in his mouth I'll give you an indice : fukura.
  15. How can you say he can reconfigure the shinogi if you don't know how? It's like saying there are green giraffes but I've never seen one....
  16. And how does he do it?
  17. I'm not a collector, I'm only interested in knowledge.
  18. Thanks, just goes to show that you should always check whether what you read or are told is relevant or not.
  19. That's because you haven't understood it, even though it's very clear.
  20. That's bother me, it's named as tachi and it has a typical naginata naoshi sugata. If Jussy could check ?
  21. Yes, but they're talking about nakago. A naginata can be made in the naginata naoshi style, as Kanzan Sato says in his article. Once again, nothing can prove the contrary
  22. It's impossible to know. It would have to be documented (the same naginata before and after) by the craftsman who did the work. A kissaki is not like a nakago, where there are clues showing that it has been suriage. The mune is polished and burnished, with no trace of alteration. A true naginata naoshi Description says the nakago is suriage.
  23. The problem is that the term naginata naoshi includes both real naginata naoshi and those made in style (see Kanzan Sato's article).
×
×
  • Create New...