Benjamin

Here is my pic if it can help

I bought an item from Touken Takarado at Japan Art Fair. I wanted to share my great experience. They were as friendly as professional. Their inventory was very interesting with a wide proposition from koto to very young blades, always qualitative. Highly recommended!

I add also had a great experience at Japan Art Fair, the three days wasn't too much to enjoy blades and people. I regret not having met our german fellows but I was caught up by time. I want to especially thanks the sellers for their kindness and availability, always ready to present theirs items. And of course a great thanks to the organizers. Giordy, I dreamed of this giant Ayanakoji friday night, very impressive and beautiful blade. By the way I didn't Shinsa'ed anything so can't express. I will come back next year. Can't say it better

Hello, I'll be there from friday to sunday, but with family and they will do a little of sightseeing and I'll join them according to the program of the show or the program of their visits. I would be interested with a NMB meeting but can't commit. Watching for what you decide.

Beyond the debate, this thread is a pleasure for the eye! There are beautiful pics here and there. Love Naginata Naoshi.

Indeed we are all the souls of our collection , may it be a real or an "in mind" collection. The question could have been some sort of "who are you?". All of yours answers are very inspiring. Thank you very much.

Thank you very much Kirill, I read it and learned lot of things. By the way I think publishing without reference is an exercise of bravery that suit you. It allow you to point the unsaid we will never read elsewhere. Very usefull, and great complement to other forms of reading. Made me think I will stay beginner for a long time

Very interesting, It's the right balance between keeping enough basic knowledge, not to let the neophyte behind, and enough details to tell an unheard story even for big readers. I also look forward for more.

Thank you very much HB. I took my tickets, and can't stand waiting to be there

Thank you HB, I'm interested too. I think I'll try to come.

Hum.. France lost the war thanks to stubborn high-grade military who denied some realities... By the way, I have a theory which say that when americans make fun of french, they are not confident with their actual situation (please, take it as a friendly funny reprisals, not a pretext to talk politics).

Having participated to this thread, I want to greatly thanks Michaël, Thomas and Uwe for their posts with nuances and corrections. Please, don't stop precising things that you think they have to be precised. I'm agree with you, Uwe, with the fact that us, newbies, always need the counterpart to forge a opinion. Paradox is that Jacques is frequently sustained by experimented folks here, saying he is frequently right... but being constantly countered... making the whole thing not always understandable for us, common people. Moreover his attitude don't simplify that. Jacques, you are challenged with strong arguments, you have to answer more constructively. As I said to you, I tried to past through your attitude to see what you really have to say, I played the game. Here I'm struck to see how your knowledge is constructed with strong bias. Isn't there a bit of cognitive dissonance you tend to resolve by misinterpreting reality rather than nuance or change your opinion? That's sad because you obviously have worked a lot. You would gain taking a step back and think about it. Best regards to all

There is (and there will be) countless post on Jacques's behaviour. Shouldn't we, this time, focus on the thread that is really interesting? Of course, it's up to us, newbies, to read with critical sense, through the participation of all.

In my understanding of the discussion: - books (Nagayama and Nakahara at least) are stating that all non-suguha hamon are Midareba. - Jacques is stating that NOT all non-suguha hamon are midareba, some non-suguha hamon are midare (irregular) or have midare elements, some are not, they are regular (and I think he is not wanting to say that japaneses never use the term midare in their description of hamon). - Nakahara clearly state "the category of midare can be further broken down..." - Jacques is saying "midare is not a type of hamon, just a characteristic of the hamon" For me the 2 statements are not compatible (and I'm not the one to settle the discussion). That's what fascinate me with Nihonto, it resist to be resumed in a category (art object, weapon, collectible, martial art, antiquity...)