Bruce Pennington

Scott,

A couple of points, just to help you see what John is seeing:

- You can see the wavy pattern in the blade steel that is known as Damascus steel.  It is very common in Chinese blades imitating Japanese.  Don't know why they do it, because the Japanese NEVER used Damascus pattern steel.

- Notice the offset spacing of the two notches where the blade meets the nakago (tang).  Again, a standard Chinese practice.  Japanese made the notches even with each other.  (side note: the Japanese NCO swords had offset notches, but this is not and NCO sword)

- The etched-on characters on the blade: Not a Japanese practice.

Richard,

Welcome!  You can read about these on Ohmura's site: WWII Japanese Officer Shingunto - Type 98

Care and cleaning: Japanese sword Care

There are two Yukimune in Markus Sesko's swordsmith list:

"YUKIMUNE (行宗), Shōwa (昭和, 1926-1989), Fukuoka – “Moritsugu Yukimune” (守次行宗), real name Moritsugu Tsunesaburō (守次恒三郎, his first name can also read Kōzaburō), born August 11th 1910, he studied under Sakurai Masatsugu (桜井正次), Masayuki (正幸) and Takahashi Sadatsugu (高橋貞次), during World War II he worked as rikugun-jumei-tōshō, he came from the lineage of Moritsugu Koretoshi (守次是利), kihin no retsu (Akihide), Second Seat at the 6th Shinsaku Nihontō Denrankai (新作日本刀展覧会, 1941) (see picture right)

YUKIMUNE (行宗), Shōwa (昭和, 1926-1989), Gifu – “Yukimune” (行宗), real name Nakane Yohei (中根与平)"

With your two-character mei, yours could be the second one.  I'd check higher above the smith's name for any stamps, possibly a star stamp.

Congrats, John!  It's a beauty!  You're now an official member of the side-latch community.  

I got lucky and have one from the 130's and one from the 200's.  Love them!

4 hours ago, Lareon said:

markings

Modified Roman numerals “19“.  Do the fittings have stamped numbers that might correlate?

No kidding!  Too bad it didn't come with the rest of the fittings.  Would have loved to see what they did to the habaki on that one.

5 hours ago, ROKUJURO said:

and for me, the question arises who should learn the correct terms? 

Ha!  I feel your pain, brother!  My efforts to change the community's use of "Type 3, Type 44, Type 100, Marine Landing sword" to Contingency model (Rinji seishiki) feel like standing in hurricane force winds and saying "Hey wind, blow in the other direction!".  

The community is too large, compared to our 'footprint' here at NMB, and the terms have decades of use reinforced by all the important reference books.  So, I have adjusted to casually mentioning the correct terms while discussing them using the old labels.

3 hours ago, ROKUJURO said:

Matt,

that may well have been in the distant past. Do you have any evidence for that?

The actual definition is:

" A dirk is a long-bladed thrusting dagger It is most famously known as the traditional sidearm of Scottish Highland clansmen and officers, serving as both a formidable combat weapon and a symbol of cultural honour....."

A dagger is undoubtedly a two-sided thrusting knife. There are indeed dagger-shaped bayonets (Switzerland) but the one shown above is not one of them.

Jean Collin,

I have seen this debate in the past, and it revolves around dirks/daggers from another era and/or other countries.  The WWII (acually they originated in the 1800s) Navy and rare Army dirks are called "dirks" by the entire militaria collecting world:

Omura - Military Swords of Imprerial Japan: Navy Dirks

The emblem indicates a Police Patrolman & Sergeant sword.

Like the other guys said, if the blade were a converted waki, you would see a bamboo peg, a mekugi, through the side of the handle, holding the blade in place.  The police swords were usually shorter, like this one.  It is very uncommon to find a full-length gunto sized police sword, though they can be seen in reference books.

Thanks for the added shots, Tony!  @SteveM might correct me, but I believe that is Koriki Kanemasa.

I have one other similar rig, with one of his blades in it.  Similar enough to think they were both done by the same shop.

Here's the other one:

Becca,

Sam probably explained this while with you in person, but just in case - The handle (tsuka) and other fittings are that of a Type 98 Army officer.  Many older, family blades were fitted out for WWII, both army and navy.  The scabbard (saya) would originally have had a leather cover.  They often go missing over the decades.  You can see examples of the in pristine condition on Ohmura's site:  Military Swords of Imperial Japan - Informality Fittings

See this page for care and cleaning: NBTHK Sword Care Guide

Thanks David!  I see it is just a dark spot, that in the original photo looked like it might be a stamp.

14 hours ago, Lareon said:

seki stamped civilian gunto 

Thanks Tony!  Any chance of a link to the rest of the sword?

2 hours ago, John C said:

Are you recording the showato Katsumasa as well?

 

John C.

I record all blades with any stamp.  All of them, except the star stamped blades, are showato in my opinion.  Are you asking if I record non-stamped showato?  If so, no I don't.

27 minutes ago, drac2k said:

Bruce, was that a request for me or Marcin?

David, I was asking about the stamp on your blade, please.

Nazar,

The two sides seem identical to me.  What are you seeing that is "similar" but not identical?

Congrats on your Type 95.  Glad to see you really appreciate it!  I know what you mean.

I have 52 Katsuamasa blades on file with the full range of stamps - Showa, Seki, Na, and Gifu.

Can I get a clear shot of the stamp at the top of your mei?

The stamp under the stacked cannon balls is the WA, which Fuller says: 
"‘Wa’ stamp. Probably indicates manufacture in an occupied area, most likely by a collaborating force. Found on poor quality rolled or hammered blades."

Now, that is in context of sword blades, so don't know if that directly translates over to bayonets.

@Kiipu might be able to help with all the rest.

Don't know what you've got there, but I don't believe it was made in Japan.

Hopefully others with experience with weapons from other countries  can comment.  

The small stamp on the back edge is the "HO" of the 1st Factory of the Kokura Army Arsenal.  It's the first Akinobu blade I have on file with the stamp.  Of course there are likely many others as many times, the mune is not shown on auctions and personal posts.  The stamp, by itself is not a sure indicator of whether the blade is traditionally made or not, especially when found on the mune.

WWII officer swords normally sell in the $900-1,400 USD range if non-traditionally made.  Higher if traditional.  

Your fittings put this in the Showa era.  I can't speak to the making of the blade.  If it's acid etched, then it's not likely to have been traditionally made.  Maybe one of the guys that collect dirks can comment.

I try.  Some listen, others don't.

Ha!  I know!!!  Total cultural disconnect.

Your right, it's a common fake.

Thanks Joe!  That small vertical stroke on the left side thew me off.  But I do have 6 of his blades on file, and one of them has that same little stroke on the left.  Both have that light blue painted number, different numbers.

This was posted as Kanenao.  Is that correct?  I don't see a Kanenao or Kinnao or Kinmichi on the RJT list, and don't see the name in Sesko's list either.

Good point on the added numbers of 32s, Conway!  That would greatly increase the number of NCO gunto, and we know from photos that many 32s were part of the post-war confiscation.

Russ, I also agree that your idea may be true.  Another option to consider is the provision, during shortages, for officers to purchase Type 95s.  I think it's possible an officer could have bought this and filed off the number.

Sam,  After reading Nick's post stating that "senior NCOs and Warrant officers" were authorized, it would certainly reduce the number of NCOs that needed swords.  I suspect that the reality was a bit different than the regulatory picture.  Just from photographs alone, my impression is that more guys were carrying these than just Sergeant Majors and Warrant officers.  But your numbers certainly brings that reality back closer to Nick's observation than my idea that all NCOs carried them.

Thanks for bringing this up!