Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all ,

hoping you can help with information on this pistol. 
 The dims are overall 320 mm , barrel 85mm 

and bore 11mm.  If you can help with the translation of the Mei , also the the inscription underneath the barrel - seems suspect to me - 

with poor outline of what looks like a butterfly. 
 

Thanks in advance . 
Alan 

 

 

 

IMG_7566.jpeg

IMG_7567.jpeg

IMG_7568.jpeg

IMG_7564.jpeg

IMG_7565.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

A new addition for you? This looks like an example of a Namban Ryū (Southern Barbarian Style) pistol, a gunnery school in Japan deliberately designed to look foreign, to show exaggerated outlandish features.
The front sight looks to have been knocked off…(?)

As to the markings underneath the barrel, they do look fairly random as you say, and these among other signs suggest that someone has been tweaking or adding to the gun since its export from Japan.

 

Despite some alterations, basically an honest gun I sense from your photos.

  • Like 2
Posted

Hi Piers 

once again many thanks for your valued information … yes it is another addition .. to be honest I got this before the Tanegashimas - but … I had my reservations about posting this worried it may be a copy due to the “ scribble “ underneath the barrel . Anyway glad I did now - knowing it is a honest gun😊

Piers have you any idea on what the inscription says on top of the barrel? Also any idea of period ? 
It is strange that it does not have a front sight .. I’ve looked and to be honest I can’t see any indication it had one… but that would make no sense . 
Here are close up pics of the front of the barrel 


 

IMG_7576.jpeg

IMG_7575.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

The top writing when present was often the mark of the person later decorating a barrel, but when in fine silver etc., inlay, it was sometimes an exhortation. It looks readable but my brain is not yet coming into focus 韮張 plus 花王 doesn’t seem at all right… maybe you could post that in the translation section for fresh eyes!

 

The woodwork of your gun could well be newer, meaning the gun was possibly rebuilt at some time. The absence of a front sight is puzzling, but these pistols were never designed for accuracy, meaning the placement of sights was mostly a token gesture. If the base marks of a front sight have been erased, it is a very good job.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...