Nafta

Hello Geraint, I took a closer look and it looks like both sides had some work done. Also I measured the space between the two mekugi ana and it measures 14mm. Coincidentally the edge where it looks like work has been done also measures 14mm. I’ve been told it was a civilian blade repurposed for WW2. But I can’t proof any of it.

My apologies Rivkin. There’s a max on MB I can upload. That’s why I chose the smallest files possible. Ive uploaded pics in a higher resolution for better viewing. https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4whdHh

Hi Tensho, I haven’t bought to from eBay. The guy I bought is from is a collector of Dutch swords, sabres and cutlass. A Japanese didn’t fit in so he wanted to part with it. So 4 seppa is not normal and reason to concern? I have added an extra pic of the tsuka. Maybe this is a bit more clear.

Hi Bruce, Thank you for your response. Yes everything was there, I only added the “fabric”. Imo, with tassel attached looks a bit more complete. The leather cover has a good fitting, neither overly tight nor loose. And snap fasteners can be closed without excessive force.

And a few more pictures.

Greetings to you all, I have recently acquired a Japanese swords and I would appreciate informed opinions on its construction, mounts and period. My experience is limited, I am hoping to learn from members with greater expertise and welcome any observations or corrections. Blade: Mumei and no arsenal stamps observerd. light scratches and small dark spots. Mounts: Civilian koshirae, wooden lacquered saya with horn koiguchi/kojiri, metal reinforcement band at the koiguchi. Suspension: Loose, sliding ashi, leather field saya cover. Tsuka: Samegawa, iron fuchi/kashira, iron tsuba. The tassel was added by me. It wasn’t originally present with the sword. Fit: All components tight, blade sits firmly in the saya. Overall length is approx. 100 cm (including saya). Questions: 1. Do the mounts appear to be a wartime remount/adaptation, or a later assembly using mixed parts? 2. Based on visible characteristics, is the blade more likely traditionally made or non-traditional? 3. Are there features on the nakago or in the koshirae that might help date the sword more precisely? 4. I am not asking for a valuation, but would appreciate guidance on overall quality, study potential and whether it is worth of further investment. Thank you for any insight you may be willing to share. -Naf-