Jump to content

Beater

Members
  • Posts

    64
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Isle of Wight, UK

Profile Fields

  • Name
    Kevin

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Beater's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/14)

  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Reacting Well
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

94

Reputation

  1. Hi Henry, I think Grevedk has it covered. I thought I’d show you the (only) two methods I know and use and which are also the only two given in the book ”Japanese Swordsmanship” by Warner & Draeger. There may well be others and the various schools of swordsmanship all have their own versions of just about every aspect of sword use / etiquette, which defines their own interpretation - but these will serve you well for most situations. Regards, Kevin.
  2. Just a thought, but would this be because of the death of Fujiwara Kanenaga, who worked at the Tenshozan forge and certainly signed many blades with his distinct small, precise kanji? I can’t recall the exact date of his death but I know it was in 1943. Regards, Kevin.
  3. Any stamps above or below the mei Pippo? 23rd generation Kanefusa used some interesting forging techniques, including the kabuse method. I used to own one that had a large stamp with lots of small kanji inside, situated below the mei, it effectively said made by the kabuse method. I believe it was a similar method to how Mantetsu swords were made ie by inserting a soft metal core inside a harder skin pipe? Agree, that is a nice hamon. https://www.Japanese...dex.com/kanefusa.htm
  4. Thanks for sharing Eric. What I see with yours and others I’ve seen for sale on Aoi etc is that post war art polishes reveal so much more than typical wartime polishes on Nagamitsu blades. He may have made decent swords but who ever polished for him set the bar low - I guess for wartime / campaign use all you really needed was a reasonable polish and sharpen. Your hada is very nice indeed.
  5. Thank you. No, not suguha but there are lengths of hamon much less pronounced than the peaks of gunome you see clearly in my first batch of photos. Photo 4 shows the more pronounced gunome and photo 5, towards the kissaki, a more gentle. gunome.
  6. Another interesting addition. So, that’s three katana-mei all in civilian mounts. I agree the koshirae does not look new. I did note the painted numbers on the nakago which I associate with aiding assembly - matching up blades to (military?) mounts, where the numbers are often repeated on the seppa etc. Can’t recall seeing painted assembly numbers on a Showa civilian-mounted sword…anyone? Quite a short katana at just over 24” (62.1cms). I understand that shorter and very stout blades are a feature of Nagamitsu.
  7. So Trystan’s old thread revival of the “Crow Castle” sword which originally was in Type 98 fittings is signed tachi-mei, as is mine. Peter’s own bo-hi and the civilian mounted sword he has seen on eBay are both signed katana-mei. Not a large enough sample to draw any conclusions (yet) but it is shaping-up. I am coming round to the belief that Nagamitsu did not just randomly decide to sign tachi-mei or katana-mei, but did so based on the customers intended choice of mounts.
  8. That would also be my hypothesis now I know it is civilian-mounted. One wonders if it were carried to war, with a leather combat cover? It is hard to imagine, with the great demand for officer’s swords at that time, that a martial arts practitioner could order a blade for their entirely personal, not military use, unless perhaps some respected Sensei, too old for military service but with sufficient status and clout to still get his wishes granted.
  9. Oh Peter, any bo-hi blade grabs my attention, so that’s a real bonus! Plus the different use of that dating system. This is indeed a rare mei. Love it! Thank you again. This is exactly what I hoped this thread might produce. There seems to be a great deal of speculation about why there are such variation of mei from Nagamitsu, so I hoped others fortunate to have owned the longer mei / dated swords and those who have already done some research, might add their findings. From that we may see patterns developing. Any thoughts why your katana side mei bucks the trend of the seemingly more commonly encountered tachi-mei? How is it mounted? Bo-hi are often ordered / sought by martial arts practitioners, so I wonder if it was ordered by someone with skill in the use of a sword or perhaps because it was supplied in katana mounts? I guess technically all Type 98 mounted swords, like mine, are mounted in tachi style fittings. No stamps, again like mine. We know he was RJT, so star stamps would be expected. Saka stamps are sometimes found, showing a blade made for or at the Osaka arsenal.
  10. I hope these photos cover the points you wanted to see. They are taken with my i-phone and I tried with and without flash. Best I can do. I’ve used Slough’s pages on Nagamitsu as a backdrop, as, from the photos you requested, I’m guessing you want to compare alongside his example? To my eye the similarities are evident and although the nakago-jiri of the long signature example in Slough differs slightly from mine, you have only to turn the page to see another example which is a dead ringer. Slough says that one is Shoshinmei, so I’d conclude Nagamitsu’s nakago-jiri show slight variation.
  11. Thought I’d share my sword with the Military sword / gendaito enthusiasts. I’ve read many of the old threads on NMB regarding Ichiryushi Nagamitsu and the debates around the many mei used to sign his (or in many cases his students) swords. In my mind this rare example, having both his “full-Monty” mei and a date is, undoubtedly, the work of the man himself. “Bizen ju Ichihara Ichiryushi Nagamitsu saku” and dated to May, 1944. There are no stamps whatsoever to be found on the nakago. Original, wartime polish. Slough’s book shows a similar example and I have only found reference to two others similarly signed pieces. Mine has quite a late date. I suspect that the green-blue ito and use of Type 98 mounts, rather than the more common Type3 seen on other later Nagamitsu blades, points towards this being a special order / custom made sword. Any observations, comments or new information regarding this fascinating smith greatly received. Kevin.
×
×
  • Create New...