SteveC Posted August 24 Report Posted August 24 (edited) Hi all, first post. Katana in shirasaya, and I'd like help reading the tang. Not after a valuation - I just want to know what it says. The inscription is on one face only. The reverse is completely blank apart from the mekugi-ana (photo included), so there's no date anywhere on the blade. My best guess is a five-character mei ending in 國貞. But I honestly can't tell what the FIRST character is, the one nearest the machi. It reads to me as either 大 or 文, and that changes everything. I did look before posting. I know the well-documented Kunisada is 和泉守国貞, Izumi-no-kami, founder of the Osaka Shinto school - and that's a different title from what I think I'm seeing. I've been through nihontoclub, touken-world, meitou.info and this board in both English and Japanese, and I can't find a Yamato-no-kami Kunisada anywhere. So just two questions: 1. What do you read? 2. Is that first character 大 or 文? Blade is ubu, one mekugi-ana, nagasa 65.2 cm, unpolished, shirasaya. Photos are CLAHE-enhanced to lift the chisel strokes; an unprocessed colour version is included too. I have 124 raw frames of this tang at full resolution, so if a different angle or lighting would help, just say and I'll pull it. Thanks for any reading, including "you've got it wrong." Edited August 24 by SteveC Quote
Ray Singer Posted August 24 Report Posted August 24 The kanji and reading are below: 大和守国貞 - Yamato (no) kami Kunisada. 4 Quote
SteveC Posted August 24 Author Report Posted August 24 Thank you very much!! That settles the character I couldn't read, and it confirms the name. Two follow-ups if you have a moment: 1. Since there's no date on the blade, is there anything in the sugata that suggests a period to you? I had been assuming Bunsei, but I now realise that assumption rested entirely on my misreading 大 as 文, so I have nothing behind it. 2. Is 大和守国貞 a name you've encountered before? I can't find a Yamato-no-kami Kunisada in any reference I have access to - only the Izumi-no-kami line. I'm not looking for a valuation, I just want to understand whether this is a smith who's simply outside the indexed record or whether I'm missing something. Happy to shoot better photos of the blade if it would help - the one I posted has the kissaki out of frame. Thanks again. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.