Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, Rivkin said:

It’s a rare case where I would ask someone to show this blade to Tanobe sensei before doing anything else. The forging might be good quality also.

I would love to hear what he thinks. I believe the sword is of good quality. It’s hard to capture in photos.

IMG_6016.jpeg

Posted

Nicholas:

Just out of curiosity, what does the area around the mekugi-ana look like? Specifically, does the rim of the ana rise above the chisel marks or do the chisel marks cut into the rim? It could help determine if the mei were cut after the mekugi ana was formed.

 

John C.

Posted
5 minutes ago, John C said:

Nicholas:

Just out of curiosity, what does the area around the mekugi-ana look like? Specifically, does the rim of the ana rise above the chisel marks or do the chisel marks cut into the rim? It could help determine if the mei were cut after the mekugi ana was formed.

 

John C.

I took some pictures because I can’t tell.

IMG_6018.jpeg

IMG_6019.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Posted

These little cuts into the ana suggest the mei was cut after the ana was formed. Could be another piece of evidence depending on the process used by Kotetsu or Kajihei.

John C.image.thumb.png.af128b2af023fed74168e009dfbf3499.png

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, John C said:

These little cuts into the ana suggest the mei was cut after the ana was formed.

I’m going to have to look more into this. I never thought about that. Thanks 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...