Ware

[Samantha_C]

I'd like to ask members opinion please.

 

Considering a ware is non-fatal- What is your idea of a bad ware?

 

What minimum size of ware would you consider a concern that affects the quality of the workmanship?

 

Would a Mukansa smith sign his sword even though a ware was apparent?

 

 

Thank you!

[nagamaki - Franco]

Hello,

 

Any ware.

 

An explanation, there are typically 2 kinds of collectors, one where a ware doesn't bother them, the other kind is where their eye regardless goes straight to the ware every time. 

 

Beyond that, more specifically, open ware, ware any where within the hamon, and ware smack dab in the middle of the sword.

[Brian]

Very difficult to answer. Flaws are tolerated more on older swords. The older, the more they are tolerated as long as the quality is good. However, some schools are known for thinner skin steel, and flaws are also more tolerated or expected, such as Hizento. All flaws bother....that's why they are flaws. But if you have a 800 year old tachi that has been polished multiple times, a few openings are overlooked generally. However, on a Shinsakuto made yesterday, they are not.

I don't think a Mukansa smith would tolerate visible flaws, since the sword is not made as a weapon, but purely as art. I find fukure more disturbing than thin horizontal openings.

There is no size specifications where flaws go from acceptable to not....it would have to be a judgement call based on the sword in hand.

 

Brian

[zentsuji2]

I have a couple of ware on ww2 kanemoto, sometimes they don't appear until a togisghi. polishes. the sword.

Unless you can afford excellent polish, they are part of a poorer collectors life,especially if you like hizento, even ww2 swords get them,if the swords pleasing,and you can live with them there part of a swords life, but getting a bit chooser now,as it can spoil a beautiful view.

 

Best regards, Ian Bellis