Before I begin,
I am a complete noob; this topic has probably been discussed before. I did search "awataguchi shintogo kunimitsu", but not only did that not produce any IMHO satisfying results, i would like to ask some more-current perspective on the subjects. Again, i am complete noob: everything i naively presume about these two/one smith is based ENTIRELY on a very, very ~casual~ reading of Darcy's wonderful contribution on his website--and i cannot thank him enough. (And i say casual as in, i did not read it whilst eating ramen noodles; i mean casual as in, if you are serious i.e. the opposite of casual, you should read a book not a website)
Okay, my question:
Can somebody tell me WHY someone would think they are two or one smith? If the work style is so similar, does it really ~matter~ if they are different people? If we are interested in the formation of let's say, the Rai school or Soshu, is it not enough to say, "Okay, so here is Awataguchi Kunimitsu and his stuff looks like....this (pointing to Darcy's website)...And here is a Rai Kuniyuki and his stuff looks like...this (pointing to Darcy's website).......And here is a Takagi Sadamune that, although may be Nidai, ~probably~ looks like shodai enough and it looks like...this." In order to make a very casual, noob-generalization as "So this ~could be~ from what Rai and Soshu departed from, and the result of the departures are what ~could be~ these"
So, how would an experienced Nihonto scholar ~generally~ describe the "biggest" difference between early Soshu from early Rai (apart from the Bizen influence? Sounds kinda theoretical to a noob like me, can you explain in shapes/colors/etc?). I lost my copy of The Connoisseurs'...
Thanks,
Caleb