Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Gentlemen. :bowdown:

 

I'm looking for some info on the above Shin Shinto smith. Based in Higo c1825, a student of Suishinshi Masahide. As usual when I need info I dont have my books handy although I dont recall seeing his name in the books I do have, and Google doesnt give me anything apart from the information above, and the fact he was a samurai, a retainer of the Kumamoto domain in Higo.

serves me right! I just acquired a sword by him on spec and I dont know a thing about the dude. :D

Posted

Hi Chris.

 

I'm not 100% sure on anything really, the sword is ex Mike Yamaguchi and thats the info he had on the ebay auction. (against my own advice I do occasionally buy on ebay). Apparently this swordsmith also wrote a few books on forging methods. He is listed apparently in the Toko Taikan page 448 (a book I do not have).

If the smith is fairly obscure its unlikely the signature will be gimei, and for the price I paid, on a speculative bid, I cant really go wrong even if it is.

Posted

The Meikan doesn't add much- from Higo, Masahide group (probably Naotane's student with the Naomune mei), and that he did a lot of research on forging....

Posted

Hi,

 

Yes, there is a Naomune (Numata) quoted in the Toko taikan, Higo province student of Shuishinsi Masahide school, rated 150 man. Infortunaly no oshigata.

Posted

My sincere thanks to all who have responded. Chris, Jacques and Ludolph. I would still like to know more about the swordsmith however and Ludolph's tantalising article in Japanese has given me a headache in trying to translate it. What information lies locked within that page eludes me. Any help in that direction would be a greatly appreciated.

 

For the sake of interest, the sword in question:

 

 

Once again, thank you gentlemen for your interest and your assistance. :D

post-1773-14196785706334_thumb.jpg

Posted

If the smith is fairly obscure its unlikely the signature will be gimei...

 

That is not necessarily true. Many lower ranked smiths have been faked exactly because people think that only the big names are faked...$17K for a sword is plenty of motive to make a fake...

 

The nakago on your sword is quite different in shape than that in the example posted....I would check it carefully...

Posted

Chris.

 

Mei closeups as requested. These are from the original listing as I do not have the sword in hand yet. I also have found no genuine oshigata against which to check it.

post-1773-14196785722332_thumb.jpg

post-1773-14196785724292_thumb.jpg

Posted

Thanks again Ludolph. I received the sword today and compared the mei with your example. Its always better in hand. There are small differences but head on rather than at an angle as the photographs show it, the mei is very close and the chisel strokes almost match perfectly. I'm not 100% sure, but theres every reason to believe the mei is genuine. :D

I have to say that the sword is much better in hand than the ebay pictures show. Komonjo has proven itself in this instance, so thanks to mike Yamaguchi as well. A little of my faith in ebay dealers has been returned. :thanks:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...