Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yup, and it's priced that way. I haven't translated the sayagaki myself, but if as Tsuruta says that Tanobe thinks the blade is considered one of Shodai Yosozaemon's best works, that is saying something.

  • Like 1
Posted

Gorgeous workmanship, and I don't consider myself typically an appreciator of Sue Bizen work. What I don't understand though is that Tanobe says the nakago is ubu but to my eye the last kanji is partially cut. Kiri nakagojiri isn't normal either. His tends to be ha agari kurijiri

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9879646e62f82bd9c8ae8a0f91f023c6.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted

I was thinking the same as well . The last character def looks cut.

 

And wouldnt that disqualify from Juyo for muromachi blades ? Or would this be an exception due to name and quality

Posted

It is very nice sword.

 

Sometimes it can be tricky what is seen as ubu nakago. NBTHK states also in Jūyō that nakago is ubu.

 

In my understanding if machi is in original position the nakago end can be cut and sword is still seen as ubu. There are few extreme examples of this in naginata, where I believe the nakago is cut for 50cm and it is still seen as ubu.

 

Also sword can still be ubu even though there is machiokuri. In these cases I would assume that nakago needs to be original form other than machiokuri. Otherwise it will just fall under suriage.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...