DirkO Posted August 6, 2015 Report Posted August 6, 2015 I bought this Hon’ami origami (Tanuma origami 1750<->1810) at auction (just the origami) and now I’m having a go at the translation. It was an interesting exercise, and now I need some help to fill in the missing pieces and to possibly correct where I’m wrong. The way I see it, it was first issued 1787 (Hon’ami Kokyu) and some years laters the origami was confirmed after further suriage by Hon’ami Koitsu/Koichi (Markus Sesko says Koitsu, Albert Yamanaka says Koichi). Any help greatly appreciated! 兼定 – Kanesada 正真 – shoshin (authentic) 長サ貳尺貳寸八分 X 磨上有之nagasa ni shaku ni sun hachi bu X suriage kore ari 代金子拾五枚dai-kinsu jū go mai 天明七年未Tenmei nana nen hitsuji (1787 – year of the goat) 弥生 三 日 来阿 [光久]yayoi mikka Hon A [kakihan Kokyu] (16th generation Hon’ami mainline master) Backside of origami: 享和三年 霜月 三日 長 貳尺 壱寸 九分 X 磨上Kyōwa san nen shimotsuki mikka (1803, 11th month, 3rd day) nagasa ni shaku ichi sun kyu bu X suriage x x 光一 x x Koitsu/Koichi + Kao (personal kao?) (17th generation Hon’ami mainline master) Quote
Markus Posted August 7, 2015 Report Posted August 7, 2015 Hi Dirk, The missing parts are: 少 - In the part after shoshin, so "a little bit suriage ニ - Particle ni in the part after Kyôwa three. 承認 - as "confirmation" atop of Kôitsu. Quote
DirkO Posted August 8, 2015 Author Report Posted August 8, 2015 Thanks a lot Marcus! Do you happen to know if confirmations like this occurred often? Or was it more common to issue a new one, although that would warrant extra fees again? Quote
Markus Posted August 9, 2015 Report Posted August 9, 2015 I have only seen less than a handful over the years and would consider them as rarity. Maybe because the blade was just shortened something was arranged with Hon'ami so that the older paper can stay. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.