Hi everyone, I’d like to share a recent restoration project. My goal for this piece was simple: "It doesn't have to be pristine; it just has to be 'Real'." I focused on an aging process (restoration) that respects the blade’s history rather than hiding it. However, during the process, I discovered some fascinating technical details on the Nakago (tang) that I’d love to get your thoughts on.
Blade Details & Findings:
blade long : 21 inc ,thickness :7-8 mm (Wakizashi)
The Nakago: Features heavy Tagane-ato (chisel marks) and a deep patina.
The Mystery Mark: I found a deep hole that was drilled/punched but did not go all the way through.
The Evidence: Upon inspecting the original wood handle (Tsuka), I found a deep indentation matching the hole’s position perfectly. Inside that hole, there were traces of a soft metal—likely lead.
My Restoration Work:
Tsuka (Handle): Rebound in a deep crimson wrap, aged patina to match the dark iron fuchi-kashira (bird & bamboo motif).
Sageo: Classic black, also weathered to avoid looking "too new" against the Ishime-finish scabbard.
I would love to hear your insights on a few things:
Lead-filling (Counterweighting): How common is it to find lead-filled balance adjustments in period swords (Edo or earlier)?
The "Blind" Hole: Does this specific style of non-through-hole for balancing point to any particular school or regional craftsmanship?
Aesthetics: Does the aged crimson look do justice to a blade that is clearly "reached its era" (Toji-mono)?
Looking forward to learning from your collective expertise!