Gerry123

Hello, Sorry, I never claimed that just because it's old, it's valuable. I just wanted to express that I don't really care if it's worn; authenticity is more important to me. I never asked about its value. And since the sword is already mine, I don't need to think about it. The hamon is definitely there. If you turn the blade in the light, you can see it quite well, but I just can't get a picture of it. I only paid 400 euros for the sword, so everything's fine. Thanks for your reply. Regards, Gerry

Thank you for your assessment. Regard Gerry

Thank You for your Answer. Thanks for your reply. I don't really care if the signature is forged. What's important to me is whether it's an authentic katana. I'm new to this. But I'm familiar with other antiques, and if you have, say, a 400-year-old clock, it's not in perfect condition, and if it is, it's usually restored. These things have been used, so there must be signs of wear and tear, right?

Hello and a good Day. I have bought this Naginata at a Antique market. Yesterday. I didn't pay very much. I wanted to ask for your opinion on whether it's a fake or a genuine item. Don't ask if it's a hamon; I can't see one. The blade is super sharp, but I think it's not in great condition, which doesn't bother me. All that matters to me is whether it's authentic. Naginata is 2,20m Long. Regards Gerry

Have a nice day. I took a new picture of the hamon. I hope it's good enough. The hamon looks worn all along the edge. I can't get a better photo; I think the blade has suffered a lot over the years. It's a bit easier to see in person.The damage from the fighting hasn't penetrated the hardening process. The damage on the spine of the blade, for example, is a bit deeper, which is probably due to the softer steel.

Okay !

One more question. What do you prefer? Real Mei or Gimmei?

Thank you so much for your answers! I can now decipher the dates on swords, but I'm hopelessly lost with these kanji. Are you sure it's shortened? The blade looks very harmonious and graceful compared to other katana. I have several other swords, but this one and one of my wakizashi are somehow different; I always describe it as very fine and graceful! Perhaps it was only used for display in war. Why is there a copper hanger and why is there this Nippon sun motif on the saya? Maybe it's a family sword that an officer carried?

This sword comes from the same source as the Kabuto.The sword shows some damage to the spine and edge of the blade, possibly from battle.

I don't know which section is the right one to post this, so I'm posting it here.If this is incorrect, please move it. Thank you.This sword has been repurposed as a military sword. I think the blade is old, but I'm having trouble with the translation; perhaps someone here can help me.The tsuka (hand guard) will be newer, while the saya (sword guard) and the blade itself are probably older. I've only ever seen three sayas like this. What kind of ray/shark was used for it? The hamon (sword guard) is barely visible in the raking light, making it difficult to photograph, but it is straight. The blade weighs 840g, is 64cm long, the sori (sword guard) is 1.3cm, the kissaki (blade guard) is 3cm and pointed, the blade width is 2.6cm, and the blade thickness is 0.65cm. What do you think about this sword?

Thank you for your assessment and expertise. I'm not disappointed at all; for me, it's still a wonderful piece, and I simply think the craftsmanship is excellent. Thank you also for the other assessment; I was right that it's modern. The inlays are indeed made of ivory; you can clearly see the grain under a magnifying glass

What do you think about it?

I think this is a good example of a non-traditional military sword. A mass-produced, machine-made item for World War II.Tsuka forged from a single piece of aluminum. Copper fuchi with Arsenal stamps and identical numbers on the blade and steel saya. Naturally, no hammon is present because Blade is maschine made