Jump to content

Geoff Bogie

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location:
    Seeley Lake, Montana

Profile Fields

  • Name
    Geoff B.

Geoff Bogie's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. No history of a tassel to my knowledge. Ian, that is a complete failure of me to check the actual history of fighting on New Britain - which is a little embarrassing. Here are two more pictures of the tip and blade. I don't have one of the other side of the tang, but it is blank - no markings. Not the best shots but what I have at the moment. I can get more after Sunday (drill weekend). Dave, Bangbang and Cisco, so this was probably a machine made blade, or do you need closer/better pictures? Also, thanks for all the replies! Regards, --Geoff
  2. Hello All! First time poster. I have a Type 98 Guto (no arsenal markings or stamp) officer's shin-gunto. I have meant to find out more about this shin-gunto for a long time. It has been in the family for almost 70 years (given to my father just after the Korean War) and apparently taken from a Japanese Lieutenant General by LTC H.L. Evensizer on the Island of New Britain in 1942. Of course, I have been unable to verify any of that. From my inexperienced sleuthing on the internets, the below is what I have been able to inexpertly determine : Boshi (Tip): Okissaki (I think) Hamon: Midare (I think) Habaki: Copper, plain Tang: Haagari style, no stamp, inscriptions on one side only (see pictures) Otherwise appears to be standard Type 98 Guto fittings ("monkey hands" tassle loop) except it appears to have a copper habaki (which is generally associated with late war machine made blades?). There is some rusting/pitting from poor storage over the years and 2 <1cm dings/chips in the ha of the blade. All the furniture is in pretty bad shape. At this point I am mostly interested in the rough date and method of production for the blade. I am assuming it is a either a machine made or "handmade by other than traditional methods" blade during the WWII years. But the rusting on the tang, the lack of arsenal stamps or marks and what appears to be a signature (and to my inexperienced eyes from what I can tell, not a date) and the fact that it was supposedly a general's sword leaves the possibility it might not be? I am not looking to resell, but if it happened to be a traditionally made blade, I would look into some restoration work on the blade to remove rust and have a proper polishing job done. If it is a machine made or non-traditional, then I will happily put it back together and hang it up on my wall again. Any information someone can offer is deeply appreciated. I can provide different pictures if needed. Regards, --Geoff B.
×
×
  • Create New...