Pet Dragon
-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Posts posted by Pet Dragon
-
-
Bruce,
This makes total sense to me now. If X = 10 then, \ would = 5. So then, \II IIII would = 74, matching the rest of the sword. Odd that there is very little information about such markings. Does this point to where the sword was made or when it was made; pre shortage?
Thanks a bunch!
Dave
-
Bruce, Steve,
Thank you for the information, I appreciate and value your input. I've searched many, many, hours on the Internet that led me to a post on this message board by Steve http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/22122-paradelight-weight-gunto/ , who's sword markings are almost identical.
Bruce, Thank you for the translation on the Chuso! Did you happen to look at the Fuchi? I would like to see the markings on you're sword if you could point me to a post or have pictures.
Steve, I wish you best of luck with your enquiries; I hope you find some explanation. I will continue to reach out to my Father and Uncles for information on my sword. I know my Grandfather fought in the battle of Iwo Jima, he was part of the 5th Marine Division and is name is listed in this book https://archive.org/stream/TheSpearhead#page/n1/mode/2up Other than that, I know very little about him and the sword.
Regards,
Dave
-
Sorry for the huge pictures, I thought I knew what I was doing.
-
Hello,
I am new to the message board and new to the fantastic world of the Nihonto. I was given a sword that my grandfather brought back from WW2. The sword was in my fathers possession for many years before he gave it to me. I tucked it away in a closet, as did my father and forgot about it. Years later, after cleaning out my closet I decided to look into the sword and see if there was any value in it. This led me on a great journey to understand more about the sword and the guy who brought it back, my grandfather. After scouring the Internet for a month, I came to the conclusion that I was in the possession of a Unsigned Non-Traditional Type 94 Shin-Gunto, this is a newbie guess on my part. There are matching assembly numbers on the Tsuba, Seppa and Ireko-saya. One of the mysteries that my research has not revealed are the IIII II/ markings the sword possesses; these markings are on different pieces. My initial thought was this is a signature of some sort, but I'm still unclear as to it's meaning.
I have posted many pictures of the sword on my website. http://www.auctionyourbeer.com/sword.html; click on a picture to supersize it, then you can zoom in even closer. The pictures of interest are #7 the Kuchi gane (IIII II/ markings), #13 the Chuso (Translation?), #14 the Fuchi (Translation?), #27 the Nakago just below the Mekugi-ana (Looks like a X or Cross?), #31 and 32 the Nakago (IIII II/ markings), and #33 and 34 the Habaki (IIII II/ markings).
Any information on this sword would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Dave
Pet Dragon Solves Faux Roman Numeral Mystery!
in Military Swords of Japan
Posted
I’m honored that my input has possibly helped solve a mystery! My thoughts on the numbering “file marks” were as follows.
A numbering system with two groups of numbers.
The first group may contain the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10.
The second group may contain the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Associating the file marks with the numbers as follows:
I = 1
II = 2
III = 3
IIII = 4
\ = 5
X = 10
The first group of numbers is added together and written down. If the number ends in a zero, the zero is discarded. The second group is added and written down next to the first group resulting in the final number.
My sword has the marking: \II IIII
First Group Second Group
\II = 7 IIII = 4
Result = 74
Steve’s sword has the marking: X IIII
First Group Second Group
X = 10 IIII = 4
Drop Zero
Result = 14
Bruce’s sword has the marking: XXX I
First Group Second Group
XXX = 30 I = 1
Drop Zero
Result = 31
Thomas’s sword has the marking: XXXX \IIII
First Group Second Group
XXXX = 40 \IIII = 9
Drop Zero
Result = 49
Having fun with this…. XI \II = 117
XXXXXXXXX\IIII \IIII = 999
I only remember seeing production marks with up to three digits for these types of swords, I could be wrong on that, but if so this numbering system would stay within that boundary. Also, if there is a production mark that ended in a zero, there would be no need for a second group of numbers and the zero would be kept.
Your thoughts?