Jump to content

Easter Kantei


DoTanuki yokai

Recommended Posts

Hi

Just for our entertainment and inspired by others, i will also try to make a Kantei thread.

The blade is Unokubi-zukuri and the Shinogi is high.

 

Nagasa: 55,2cm

Kasane: 0,58cm

Sori: 1.05cm

Moto-Haba: 2,9cm

Saki-Haba: 2,6cm

Weight: 520g

I Hope everything else can be seen in the pictures.

The Nakago is hidden but i can later add it when it is too hard, its only by pictures after all.

I hope for many participants and i will let it run for a week or some days more.

Please forgive the dust on my camera lens.

Have fun and Happy easter.

931508200_11.thumb.jpg.da8e9f2c60466623dddb6173c30a4e07.jpg

2.thumb.JPG.59190cfefcd0415d7174044fec6bde5e.JPG

3.thumb.JPG.a9a24d20aafbbf2e98f059acc7816647.JPG

4.thumb.JPG.4e020d5b35712d3d66168b987a3d3c98.JPG

5.thumb.JPG.a2bafc55422dc90d0a115dae7b7077ae.JPG

6.thumb.JPG.98ef4a79e7001adb544595b863939c85.JPG

7.thumb.JPG.ee3d9605de232759468c348dac405875.JPG

8.thumb.JPG.bc40c5b054b96c089a17d4e06340d9a5.JPG

9.thumb.JPG.9828f136c51dedbc090cda34a811a25f.JPG

10.thumb.JPG.18454ad76bb8eb5f9175f4401498ca3e.JPG

11.thumb.JPG.d8460bee36382d237d6415aac4bc2fc4.JPG

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting this one. These are always great experiences.

 

Spoiler

My guess would be naginata-naoshi from Nanbokuchō period. I am also thinking it has Yamato feeling but with bit roughness (not maybe good word to use). I think I would go for Ko-Uda.

 

  • Like 3
  • Wow 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, this sword was originally made as a regular size nanbokucho tachi, which was later shortened to its actual length as a wakizashi. Perhaps there were some battle damages making a shortage to this length below katana standards necessary. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for participating and watching everyone. 
Im not sure if someone was right or wrong because it is only an attribution , but Jussi was of the same opinion as the NBTHK „Ko Uda“ so he wins I think. 
Good work i don’t know if I would be able to guess it right but I don’t want to say the NBTHK is wrong here :laughing:

 

 Maybe this could have been useful for this  (Usagiya website)

 

48445202-40C8-459D-8B4B-EC43D943CC64.thumb.jpeg.329d19cf5c8da34a15fd3f8a08377557.jpeg

And the NBTHK paper 

 

EEE448DE-D5F9-4DA6-BD35-9C8E7D6FCBF3.thumb.jpeg.c5c826bd0bde960c78691a819e75a5eb.jpeg
 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wish I could claim just hitting it by confidence but in reality lot of it was luck and I do think it could have been multiple of similarish options. I think the snippet from Usagiya is good one as I thought that way although I am not sure if rough etc. is best way to describe. I know the feature was present in some schools and I felt Ko-Uda is a quite common "bucket" attribution for such feature along with other characteristics it has around this time period.

 

I was quite sure it would have been shortened naginata but as it is classified as wakizashi I'd think it to be possibly a shortened tachi or ōdachi (I'd see that as logical but I am not yet 100% sure how NBTHK sees things).

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im also not sure how this blade start  life but from the feel I can imagine that the shape was altered because of the weight. Compared to other swords of this size and with a short nakago the blade feels still heavy. 
I prefer to say what it is now unokubi zukuri, because I think there won’t be a reliable answer how it started.

the blade seems to be in this size for long time, for me it looks like it was shortened around mid Muromachi but this is just speculation from what I see in the Nakago.

E7A8A3CE-8E78-4EBC-8498-1B0365F98D2C.thumb.jpeg.bf8073afe9e337085f93ac617bbe0f17.jpeg

 

For the Boshi I have read somewhere that sometimes they have a very long kaeri that turn into muneyaki sometimes.

EDIT:  Ohh Maybe you talk about the overall size of the Kissaki, i think it is the longest i have seen with this attribution but i can imagine that this could be from some form of reshaping from naginata or nagamaki and the small kaeri is only a repurposed bigger Hamon element.

 

Some years ago the founder Uda kunimitsu was just on papers but now there a 2 signed works existing.  I think there is more research necessary too understand Uda school better. (Alternatively i dont have the right books)

Also how reliable are sources that claim that some Uda smiths learned from Norishige, I can understand how someone can come to such conclusion but the similarities are not that much and also different.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know there is at least one book in Japanese focused solely on Etchū smiths so Uda school should be majorly focused on there, unfortunately I do not have it.

 

So far I have found 5 signed tachi by possibly various Uda Kunimitsu and 1 tanto (there is 1 only dated to 1321 but I do not count it here). These signed works according to the sources vary from late Kamakura to early Muromachi depending on the item. For Uda Kunifusa I have 10 signed tachi and 16 other signed blades from Nanbokuchō to Muromachi. Then I do have signed items from various Uda smiths from Nanbokuchō to early Muromachi. However the lack of dated items makes accurate dating of smiths tricky.

 

I know some sources list some dated items for Uda smiths that I have not yet been able to locate. So far I only have the 1321 dated blade with shumei to Kunimitsu, 1405 dated Kunifusa and 1400 dated Kunihisa (there are more dated ones later in Muromachi but those are not that relevant to me). That is extremely few dated works for the early school and I think like you that there is lot to research on this school.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/27/2022 at 4:32 AM, DoTanuki yokai said:

For the Boshi I have read somewhere that sometimes they have a very long kaeri that turn into muneyaki sometimes.

EDIT:  Ohh Maybe you talk about the overall size of the Kissaki, i think it is the longest i have seen with this attribution but i can imagine that this could be from some form of reshaping from naginata or nagamaki and the small kaeri is only a repurposed bigger Hamon element.

 

Some years ago the founder Uda kunimitsu was just on papers but now there a 2 signed works existing.  I think there is more research necessary too understand Uda school better. (Alternatively i dont have the right books)

Also how reliable are sources that claim that some Uda smiths learned from Norishige, I can understand how someone can come to such conclusion but the similarities are not that much and also different.

My apologies yes the kissaki size and boshi, was what I was referring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was not aware of that tantō at MET. I was looking it and then at various signatures of Kunimitsu and I thought it would be gimei. However when looking at all of the Uda Kunimitsu signatures I have in books, it seems to me they are all maybe bit different from each other...

 

Then I thought I had Jon Snow moment when I found out that Tanobe-sensei talked about this tanto in his Gokaden book. I will attach the Japanese text I typed from book and my rough translation.

 

Quote

十六年前に米国の美術館より修理のために寸延びの短刀で元弘三年紀 (1333) のある宇多国光が一時日本に里帰りしたことがありました.

これぞ古入道の基準銘になるのではと期待したのですが, 表は正真銘ではありましたが時代の降るもので, 裏年紀は古入道に装うために後に切り加えた偽銘でした.

 

16 years ago sunnobi tantō came to repair to Japan from a museum in USA, it was signed Uda Kunimitsu and dated to 1333. I expected it to be signature of Konyūdō. Omote signature is genuine but it is timeless? (I can't read it well but I suppose he means it is difficult to date but it is not that old as it pretends to be). Ura date is gimei and added to disguise the blade as Konyūdō.

 

Hopefully I got at least the basic idea correctly, and better translation would be of assistance. So to me it seems that Tanobe thought that tanto is genuine Uda work by some Uda Kunimitsu later in line but the date was added to fool people.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the Museum had a more positive Interpretation. 
Sad for the Tanto but its awesome that you remembered it and thanks for the efforts and Jon Snow moment. (is this related to game of thrones? I have not  seen all seasons and don’t get it ?  :laughing:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...