Jump to content

Kai Gunto issued by IJN?


BANGBANGSAN

Recommended Posts


I was checking on the file of the surrender swords by IJN in Taiwan in 1945. The list mention 私品(Privately owned)and 官品(Government/Navy property), also said some kind of carry permit in applying process for the Privately owned sword.
We all know the Type 95 NCO sword was issued by the army and its army property. It got me wondering what kind of Kai Gunto was issued by IJN?
I'm thinking maybe the double hanger black paint wood saya, with Navy anchor  logo on the tang and no smith mei, like the photos I'm posting, what do you guys think?

 

WechatIMG5337.jpeg

WechatIMG5340.jpeg

WechatIMG5339.jpeg

WechatIMG5369.jpeg

WechatIMG5368.jpeg

WechatIMG5367.jpeg

WechatIMG5328.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might try running this by Nick Komiya.  He's the one that uncovered the Army's reg that permitted private purchase of Type 95s.  Maybe you'll tickle his curiosity and get him to do some more digging.

 

On the face of it, I have never heard of "government property" officer swords of either Army or Navy.  There were arsenal-made gunto in both services, so could this possibly be referring to a gunto bought directly from the arsenal, rather than from the officers club?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Bruce Pennington said:

You might try running this by Nick Komiya.  He's the one that uncovered the Army's reg that permitted private purchase of Type 95s.  Maybe you'll tickle his curiosity and get him to do some more digging.

 

On the face of it, I have never heard of "government property" officer swords of either Army or Navy.  There were arsenal-made gunto in both services, so could this possibly be referring to a gunto bought directly from the arsenal, rather than from the officers club?

I think Type 95 is Army's property,like Type 30 bayonet and rifles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I think I'm getting a more clear picture of your question.  I thought you were saying that there was a kaigunto listed on the documents as both privately owned and government property.  I cannot read the page, so I'm going by your description.  Are you saying there is a row for privately owned, and a row for government property, and there are numbers of kaigunto in the "government property" row?  If so, I'm betting they are classifying arsenal stamped blades, like the one you posted, as "government" blades and ancestral, civil, swords as "privately owned." Sounds like whomever made the chart didn't really know how it worked for officer gunto. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Bruce Pennington said:

Are you saying there is a row for privately owned, and a row for government property, and there are numbers of kaigunto in the "government property" row?

Yes,on the right 

軍刀  五二(官品Government property)
          二九(私品Privately owned)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, BANGBANGSAN said:

I think in that chart, 長劍 means saber, 短劍 means dagger, 短刀 means Waki short kai.

 

Search JACAR for 長剣 and you will find plenty of Taiwan & naval references to this.

短剣 = for the navy, translate this as dirk.

 

@BANGBANGSAN To search JACAR, convert the older characters to the new versions using this link.  The character 劍 becomes 剣. 

Old Japanese Kanji to New Japanese Kanji Converter

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
17 hours ago, Kiipu said:

It seems the Type 97 seen in images 5337, 5339, and 5340, has a plain anchor mark.  What I mean by this is that the anchor does not appear to be encircled.  This is only the third sword I have seen with this type of anchor.

Shigemitsu & Nakago Stamp

The uncircled anchors were from Tenshozan tanrenjo aka Kamakura aka Japanese Naval Sword Company in Zishi for those who do not know .

John S.

P.S.but not like the example in kiipu's previous link.even though Shigemitsu was said to have worked at Tenshozan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...