Jump to content

Help with Nengo for Hidekage Wakizashi


tbonesullivan

Recommended Posts

Another one from the vaults I suppose.  Going back and translating past swords I've seen for translation practice. Back then I figured I would never be able to translate Japanese on tangs.

 

Anyway, this wakizashi is signed 備州 長船 秀景 - BISHU OSAFUNE HIDEKAGE. I'm fairly confident on that. 

 

The other side, as far as I can tell, reads 享 徳 二 年 二 月 for the Kyou-toku era. However that first character doesn't look quite how it should. I also looked at all the other era names with 徳 as the second character, and it doesn't quite match those either.  I have even considered it might be the "Northern Court" nengo  至徳 SHI-TOKU - 1384.

ON7939__21.jpg

ON7939__20.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jussi Ekholm said:

I think you are very close, to me it seems like Hōtoku (宝徳) 2 - 1450.

AH!!!! I was going by this chart from Japanese sword index, which has a totally different looking character. That may explain why I was so confused. Thank you so much.

1324.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a verified example by this smith dated to same year 1450, from Jūyō 34 session. Now what is interesting that in this he is signing with the form 寳徳 that is alternative way of signing the era (it was featured in Japaneseswordindex). Historically both styles were used however I am not sure if the smith would sign the year in different form in his career? Unfortunately I only have this one Hōtoku era signature from Hidekage in my records.

 

https://www.aoijapan.net/tachi-bishu-osafune-hidekage-34th-nbthk-juyo-paper/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jussi Ekholm said:

Here is a verified example by this smith dated to same year 1450, from Jūyō 34 session. Now what is interesting that in this he is signing with the form 寳徳 that is alternative way of signing the era (it was featured in Japaneseswordindex). Historically both styles were used however I am not sure if the smith would sign the year in different form in his career? Unfortunately I only have this one Hōtoku era signature from Hidekage in my records.

 

https://www.aoijapan.net/tachi-bishu-osafune-hidekage-34th-nbthk-juyo-paper/

 

That is interesting definitely. The style of the Mei on both examples does look relatively similar, as well as the shape of the tang, including the profile of the Nakago-jiri. I do recall it having a nice Hamon. It sold quite some time ago, back when I was just starting to be able to read Nengo, due to a year of Japanese in college. Sadly we didn't get any pictures of the full blade, and with flash photography getting the hamon is difficult. We did get this picture however:

 

ON7939__10.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...