gumanthon Posted January 30, 2009 Report Posted January 30, 2009 Hello, Is it possible that anyone can give me any information on the pictures listed or transalation on them please. I am sorry but in my previous listing the pictures dissappeared. So I have now listed it again. Thank you for your patience. Thanks John Quote
reinhard Posted January 31, 2009 Report Posted January 31, 2009 This is kind of strange. Your previous thread about the same issue is still posted and all you have to do is re-uploading your pictures there. As I said: The mei probably reads: Mutsu Aizu TO-SHI-RO If the mei turns out to be genuine, the sword was made during early ShinTo-period in Iwashiro province. reinhard Quote
gumanthon Posted January 31, 2009 Author Report Posted January 31, 2009 Hello Reinhard, Thank you again for the information I was pleased to receive. Is TO-SHI-RO the name of the sword smith as I cannot find any information on this name. Also you say if the Mei terns out to be genuine....do you believe it looks doubtful. Thanks again regards John. Quote
Jacques Posted January 31, 2009 Report Posted January 31, 2009 Hi, Tôshirô is a common name; there were some swordsmiths bearing this name. Few swordsmiths like Miyoshi Nagamichi included it in their signature. Quote
gumanthon Posted January 31, 2009 Author Report Posted January 31, 2009 Hi, Is that why I cannot find much information because nobody signed with this name or does it just mean it is not very good.Please forgive me if this sounds a bit silly only I am a novice Thanks Regards John. Quote
reinhard Posted January 31, 2009 Report Posted January 31, 2009 This particular mei is somewhat tricky indeed. Hawley mentions it one time as FUJISHIRO and and a second time as TOSHIRO (written with the same characters). In both cases, he is said to have signed MASANAGA earlier in his career. Obviously this is the same person and FUJISHIRO/TOSHIRO, although a common name as well, is supposed to be taken for his artist-name. This is in accordance with your sword. The nakago seems to be unshortened. The mei is complete and not part of a longer one cut off since. Unfortunately it seems to be very difficult to find any reference material for comparison. This is neither good nor bad. Maybe someone else comes up with more material on this subject. reinhard Quote
gumanthon Posted February 1, 2009 Author Report Posted February 1, 2009 Hello Reinhard/Jacques Thank you very much for taking the time to check out this information for me. Yes I would be very grateful if anybody can add any further information for me. I am a new member and fairly new to collecting Japanese swords. I enjoy very much reading the discussions on this forum and will gladly make a small donation via Paypal as requested by Brian. Thanks again for the help With Regards John. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.