Jump to content

Muromachi Period Blade?


Jcremer24

Recommended Posts

IMO, gimei (not original signature). To me, it looks like the blade has been shortened over it's life, due to the several ana (holes) in the nakago (tang) meaning, if there was a signature, it may have been lost or would be further down on the nakago. Also, the polish is very poor making blade identification (i.e. if it is a real Nagamitsu) more difficult. I like the sugata (shape) though.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m useless at mei so I’m not going to try, but I can say if your sword is muromachi it’ll have sakisori (sword curves late into the blade) like these two. 
Since you don’t have a top down photo and I’m using a phone it’s hard for me to tell but it looks like your sword has it, and also might be pretty curved so even if the signature is fake it could be muromachi, maybe even from the same general time period.

098ABCC7-C9FD-4451-A5BF-81550C886BB3.jpeg

EBFFDB0D-6ADB-427A-AEE7-F923726252B3.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, quoshy said:

IMO, gimei (not original signature). To me, it looks like the blade has been shortened over it's life, due to the several ana (holes) in the nakago (tang) meaning, if there was a signature, it may have been lost or would be further down on the nakago. Also, the polish is very poor making blade identification (i.e. if it is a real Nagamitsu) more difficult. I like the sugata (shape) though.

 

I kindly disagree, several mekugi ana are not a proof of suriage,  the location of the mei, the path taken by the nakago shinogi and the nakago jiri suggest that this sword is ubu.

 

There are several Nagamitsu even if we can exlude THE Nagamitsu


Jason, 

 

Measurements will be helpful (nagasa, sori, motohaba, moto kasane etc.).

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jacques D. said:

 

I kindly disagree, several mekugi ana are not a proof of suriage,  the location of the mei, the path taken by the nakago shinogi and the nakago jiri suggest that this sword is ubu.

 

There are several Nagamitsu even if we can exlude THE Nagamitsu


Jason, 

 

Measurements will be helpful (nagasa, sori, motohaba, moto kasane etc.).

Nagasa: 70cm(27.56in)
Saki-haba 1.9cm(0.75in)
Saki-gasane 0.5cm(0.2in)
Moto-haba 3.1cm(1.22in)
Moto-gasane 0.8cm(0.31in)
Shirasaya full length 105cm(41.34in)
Sori curve 2cm(0.79in)
 
 
measurements from the seller...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2021 at 12:09 AM, Jacques D. said:

 

I kindly disagree, several mekugi ana are not a proof of suriage,  the location of the mei, the path taken by the nakago shinogi and the nakago jiri suggest that this sword is ubu.

 

There are several Nagamitsu even if we can exlude THE Nagamitsu


Jason, 

 

Measurements will be helpful (nagasa, sori, motohaba, moto kasane etc.).

You're absolutely right. Thanks for pointing those features out. I need to slow down and pay more attention.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...