Jump to content

Which one for you?


Jussi Ekholm

Recommended Posts

This is just for fun, not intended to be too educational although it might end up to be, depending on the answers that hopefully follow.

 

Aoi Art has very recently listed 2 blades that are attributed to Sa Yoshisada (2nd one came up today), I just thought to put them up side by side and see which one forum members will like better. I immidiately knew my personal choice but I won't post it here in the first post. I'll post it in few days. Would be nice to hear the reasons why someone would choose one over the other. Both are priced at quite similar level, both are Jūyō items (65 & 15).

 

Left: https://www.aoijapan.com/katana-mumeiunsigned-attributed-as-sa-yoshisada/

Right: https://www.aoijapan.com/katana-mumei-den-sa-yoshisada/

20553-2.thumb.jpg.e767ff91902ffe8089f540df8a48accd.jpg20610-2.thumb.jpg.5a2bc75c789f02ebc4dd1194e9744d0c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the cases where I have to start with a disclaimer that my opinion on this topic is likely to be uneducated, erroneous and subjectively personal.

I think these two blades are very different and "Den" here has strong connotations.

The underlying problem is Sa school excelling in basically every single style of their time. They can be strongly Soshu flavored, Bizen, Rai or their old, provincial Yamato-sort-of style. Frankly speaking the last option is the least impressive, but every seller of such items always insists it still has some connection to Masamune and O-Sa's fame. Which it does not - its just a provincial style, and more often than not  - a coarsely forged one.

Within "Soshu works" you also have a big spread - from things that are almost Bizen, some could be mistaken for Chogi's school flavor, with ko nie and nioi and very sparse usage of any distinctively nie based activities, to the works where the foundation of hamon is sort of in nioi, but there are lots of nie activities, sunagashi, very often there is inazuma etc. Interestingly enough, the hada can in both cases can be either more or less pure itame or large featured mokume/itame/nagare based.

The work on the left is in more Bizen-like style. Jigane is probably very good, but its mostly nioi/ko nie and will not have strong Soshu feel to it. Its a style which is distinctively Sa. Its also much harder to photograph and thus pictures might not reflect the real quality out there.

The blade on the right is late Nambokucho, of distinctive later style, sunagashi dominated with somewhat rougher nie. It will be much brighter, but I wonder whether Sa Yoshisada is a strong attribution here. I feel today such items would have a strong chance to be attributed as Sue Sa, or something similar. The ones with stronger nie and masame would even go Mino Kanenobu.

I think most learned collectors today assign lesser value to this type of work, though I personally like it a lot. Here is an example. 

Still of the two blades I would take without question the one from 65th Juyo session. Later Sa works can have rougher jigane, and I suspect the 15th session examples is like that.

 

hiradosa2.jpg

hiradosa.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

65th for me. Although it is a touch shorter it is definitely healthier save for the small issue by the kissaki. I’m not really willing to tolerate rough jigane in a Juyo blade outside of very specific circumstsnces. 
 

By the way, it looks like someone had a mei removed...

 

To be honest, I don’t love either of these swords! B-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...