Jump to content

Decrease in the rating of swordsmiths for the younger generation


Recommended Posts

Again, I had some fun with the camera
This time Hizen Nidai Masahiro wakizashi - a few photos to share
I searched a bit for good examples of his father's blades and I don't think this piece lags behind his father's skill
Hawley, Toko Taikan and Fujishiro ratings are lower in all three cases
I know that the exception always confirms the rule - but mostly I see a decline in the rating of skills for the younger generations in the line
Is it due to the real loss of skills of future generations, or is it more the cause of the social prestige of the older generations?

blade.jpg

Mei2_052.JPG

D75_4563_2_045.JPG

D75_4565_046.JPG

D75_4579_047.JPG

D75_3604_042.JPG

D75_3613_043.JPG

D75_3636_044.JPG

D75_4587_048.JPG

D75_4610_049.JPG

D75_4612_050.JPG

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jacques D. said:

Brano,

 

Fujishiro rated both shodai and nidai Hizen Masahiro jo saku 

 

 

The third generation never signed Masahiro but Masanaga and he is rated chujo as well yondai Masahiro.

Jacques - may be wrong, but Shodai is Jo-Jo

https://nihontoclub.com/view/smiths/list?id_op=%3D&id=&name_op=starts&name=masahiro&kanji_op=%3D&kanji=&province=68&start_era=All&school_nid=All

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Fuuten said:

Also consider the unavailability of better grade tamehagane during several periods and regions.

 

And great job on the photos!

I think the difference in generation is 20-30 years which should not affect tamahagane as such
In addition, a good swordsmith, even after changing the place where he produced the blades maintained his quality and probably produced tamahagane from local sources.
We can only assume many things today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but technique only goes so far. I can't remember where but I read an Interesting page or article on the iron ore in Bizen province with locations and notes. If I can recall where exactly I read it I'll add. I think the theory is viable regardless of location. 

 

I think in 20 or 30 years depending on when actually they are put a lot can change but yeah it remains speculation. Just wanted to throw the variable in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an interesting question, Brano.  There are certainly several smiths where the nidai is arguably more famous than the shodai.  I am thinking Kawachi no Kami Kunisuke, Echizen Sukehiro, Kanemoto (Magoroku).  In the case of Ishido Korekazu, the nanadai is as famous as the shodai, I believe.  But in general, you are probably right.  It would be interesting to test whether it is a true quality difference or is more some sort of social pressure.  I hope that it is the former.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is definitely expected reduction in quality compared to the founder's passion, and overall East Asian perception of history is the one where you have ancient Golden Age (Yellow Emperor or Kamakura Bakufu) and then morals decay and things get worse.

I think its quite amazing that the ratings in the good book are actually quite predictive of real life's quality; this being said, I feel they can be also misleading. Quite a few supposedly chu-jo-saku smiths are just not well known or churned up too many average blades, but could still do a masterpiece on special order. I would not place much hope on different books treating the rankings independently, since they all essentially cross-referenced either each other or the same earlier sources. 

 

With Hizen I personally never felt awed by Hizen Tadayoshi. If you do Rai, you have to show impressive utsuri. I don't feel he is at the same level as others of the same style.

Actually I even prefer somewhat earlier Hizen Masatsugu, who was heavily Soshu-leaning so his suguha has more of Soshu Yukimitsu, with lots of nie and Yamato-like formations.

Masahiro first generation believed by some, myself included, to be one of the greatest of shinto. On par with Shinkai and Sukehiro. But he can be extremely flamboyant. Tons of ara nie and tobiyaki. Second generation to my eyes is a tad more balanced. There is also Yukihiro who is very interesting, but he does not have the same level of nie size control. Instead of sunagashi and clouds of nie you get "belts". There is also Kunihiro who is worse.

To me cases like this are good because you can still buy something excellent without bearing the full weight of signature premium.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would assume a student working with a teacher for a long time would pick up all the skills necessary to replicate the teachers work..

 

Times change, quality of materials, demand, costs etc.

 

Think the "respect your elders", goes a lot further in countries like Japan.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also have to consider the issue that the original smith likely picked up the trade because of a true love of the craft.  Likely even had natural talent.  Following children may have "picked up the family business" out of obligation; less love of the craft and more pressure to please father.  Yes, the son may still have been born with the natural talent.  But if the love of the work isn't there, then it will show in his workmanship.  Same principle applies in all businesses.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bruce Pennington said:

You also have to consider the issue that the original smith likely picked up the trade because of a true love of the craft.  Likely even had natural talent.  Following children may have "picked up the family business" out of obligation; less love of the craft and more pressure to please father.  Yes, the son may still have been born with the natural talent.  But if the love of the work isn't there, then it will show in his workmanship.  Same principle applies in all businesses.

Yes Bruce - I know very well what you are talking about in real life
On the other hand, I take the view of the personal freedom and the individual's own path.

What satisfies the father / mother at work may not be satisfying their child.

Life is short and everyone should, if possible, do what makes them happy - but it's a completely different topic 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brano said:

Yes Bruce - I know very well what you are talking about in real life
On the other hand, I take the view of the personal freedom and the individual's own path.

What satisfies the father / mother at work may not be satisfying their child.

Life is short and everyone should, if possible, do what makes them happy - but it's a completely different topic 

Sure, we have that freedom. I admit I do not know the Japanese culture especially back then well enough, but is it possible that children were told by their fathers “you will continue the family business“ and their obedience is demanded?”  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One has to add that "decreasing quality of later generations" with respect to pre-Muromachi items has a tint of self-fulfilling prophecy. While attributions to different lineages are (hopefully) based on kantei features, within the same linage quality plays a significant role. So we can find shinto signed chu-jo-saku with a first class blade, but in the world of early mumei blades such attribution cannot happen in principle. If its first class work it will be attributed to the founder. This also prevents one from objectively appreciating the second generation's real quality level - something which is quite possible in shinto and shinshinto. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Rivkin said:

One has to add that "decreasing quality of later generations" with respect to pre-Muromachi items has a tint of self-fulfilling prophecy. While attributions to different lineages are (hopefully) based on kantei features, within the same linage quality plays a significant role. So we can find shinto signed chu-jo-saku with a first class blade, but in the world of early mumei blades such attribution cannot happen in principle. If its first class work it will be attributed to the founder. This also prevents one from objectively appreciating the second generation's real quality level - something which is quite possible in shinto and shinshinto. 

I fully agree Kirill
from the beginning I was hoping to find a good koto mumei somewhere for an affordable price (and I'm probably not alone)
However, I quickly realized that it was almost impossible for the reasons you stated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Rivkin said:

One has to add that "decreasing quality of later generations" with respect to pre-Muromachi items has a tint of self-fulfilling prophecy. While attributions to different lineages are (hopefully) based on kantei features, within the same linage quality plays a significant role. So we can find shinto signed chu-jo-saku with a first class blade, but in the world of early mumei blades such attribution cannot happen in principle. If its first class work it will be attributed to the founder. This also prevents one from objectively appreciating the second generation's real quality level - something which is quite possible in shinto and shinshinto. 

 

You will hardly find a juyo  made by a chu-jo smith. 

And about pre Muromachi mumei swords, you are plainly wrong; just an example below but there are numerous (both are saijo). When shinsa team has a doubt on which smith made a sword, attribution will be mainly done to the school (Tegai, shikakke,  Ichimonji and so on).

 

https://www.aoijapan.net/katana-mumeiattributed-as-rai-kunitoshidiscounted/

https://www.aoijapan.com/katana-mumei-rai-kunimitsu-49th-nbthk-juyo-paper/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for my ignorance Jacques
I don't know what you wanted to say by comparing two Rai blades
(I would personally opt for the one attributed to Kunimitsu)
From the sugata it seems to me that the blade attributed to Kunitoshi is apparently older than that attributed to Kunimitsu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Bruce Pennington said:

Sure, we have that freedom. I admit I do not know the Japanese culture especially back then well enough, but is it possible that children were told by their fathers “you will continue the family business“ and their obedience is demanded?”  

I don’t think they needed to be told. Confucianism dictated it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jacques D. said:

 

You will hardly find a juyo  made by a chu-jo smith. 

And about pre Muromachi mumei swords, you are plainly wrong; just an example below but there are numerous (both are saijo). When shinsa team has a doubt on which smith made a sword, attribution will be mainly done to the school (Tegai, shikakke,  Ichimonji and so on).

 

https://www.aoijapan.net/katana-mumeiattributed-as-rai-kunitoshidiscounted/

https://www.aoijapan.com/katana-mumei-rai-kunimitsu-49th-nbthk-juyo-paper/

 

Jacques, we certainly have different definitions for "affordable". Something the price of a good car is certainly not "affordable". :laughing:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Price is not a discussion - in the end it is always determined by the market
And then what level of the given commodity we can afford
We probably all realize that for a few thousand USD it is not possible to buy a good blade (from a seller who understands what it sells)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brano said:

Sorry for my ignorance Jacques
I don't know what you wanted to say by comparing two Rai blades
(I would personally opt for the one attributed to Kunimitsu)
From the sugata it seems to me that the blade attributed to Kunitoshi is apparently older than that attributed to Kunimitsu

 

What I wanted to show with these 2 examples is that what Rivkin says is false ( If its first class work it will be attributed to the founder), the 2 blacksmiths that I quoted are not the founders of the Rai school which is Tarö Kuniyuki. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...