Jump to content

Kyu Gunto of a friend


ChrisW

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,

 

I have a friend whom owns an antique shop and is selling the following kyu-gunto to a "museum" collector- aka a person who has a large collection with the intention to make a personal museum. Regardless of how I feel about that and how it may be displayed. It caught my attention due to the very nice mounts and tassel. Its a Navy kyu-gunto and appears to have a high-end tassle on it. He is selling it to that person but since he hadn't taken it apart yet I volunteered to do so and found a two-kanji mei. The blade is about 25" nagasa and unfortunately has its kissaki clipped a little (over 1/8" an inch or so) and I am unsure if it goes through the hamon or not. The mounts have a mon on the backstrap and the scabbard is that very nice ray/sharkskin I've seen on nice ones. Makes me sad I could not obtain it, but with the tip damage I was unsure if it was too bad to save.

My asks are:

 

Translation of the mei

What grade of kyu is this?

 

I tried to buy it from him for double he paid, but he said he was committed to selling to this guy. Hopefully it is taken better care of. At least I gave it the old college try.

20210120_135820.jpg

20210120_140455.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a naval commissioned officers sword pattern of 1896. I’m not knowledgeable enough to tell you rank from the sword knot.  looks rather like a WW2 navy flag officer tassel though.  See below link for examples. 
 

 

There were three patterns of these swords originally, one for petty officers, one for commissioned officers, and one for flag officers but in 1914 all commissioned officers started carrying the type you have.
 

Blade has a very nice sugata but I can’t tell if the chipped kissaki is fatal or not.  If not for that I’d jump on it without a second thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the information! I'll pass that along to him. I just need the mei translation for him now. Thanks everyone!

And my gut feeling is that the chip is not fatal, but I couldn't honestly tell.. it was a close call. And if its not, it would require substantial reshaping to correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like 茂次 (Shigetsugu) using an alternative form of 茂. 

fitzgerald_jur1236.50px.png

I could be wrong.

Markus Sesko lists only one smith named Shigetsugu, and from the looks of your sword the smith is different from the one Markus lists. 

Could also be a fake signature. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My pictures really do not do it any sort of justice. Too bad about the signature! The mei was attractive and appeared well-executed to my eyes, but this is why I ask you guys! Thank you very much Steve! I will pass along the opinion that it is probably gimei.

 

Edit: I also just looked the swordsmith index.. Shigetsuku died in 1966.. This blade is a model 1896 made as late as... 1945?. Why would a fairly recent smith apply his signature to an older blade? The blade is very much an older blade, at least 3-400 years judging by nakago patination and came straight from a veteran's estate. I was probably the first person to unseat the blade since at least WWII as the amount of verdigris and buildup made it difficult to free the blade. The blade was in fairly good condition other than the very tip being either snapped off intentionally or accidentally. Not only that, but it has two nakago-ana which makes me think it is an older blade remounted for war in kyu-gunto mounts.

Thoughts, guys?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, thank you Steve! Silly of me to take the only result my meager search abilities could find at first! I will look for this smith instead. And I WISH it was my sword! Sadly not meant to be.

 

Edit: Hmm... probably this guy: (assuming its not gimei... which isn't an assumption I am necessarily willing to take.)

重次   Echizen

Kanbun (1661-1673)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah... really quite upsetting. Would have loved to have it. But he found some rich jerk willing to pay far more than I could reasonably pay. Its pretty near immaculate. The tip damage, light scuffing to the polish, and some fraying to the cord of the tassel were the only condition issues with the whole package. It was apparently a done deal even before I could make an offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...