Jump to content

Is this nakago a red flag?


Recommended Posts

Hello all, 

 

Saw this sword for sale locally. The pictures aren't great but from what I can tell the Hamon looks ok. The only problem is the seller is claiming it to be from the 1500s but the patina on the Nakago doesn't look right and the signature looks sloppy as hell. I am still a novice but am I correct in my assessment so far? Is this sword worth the risk?

1OO% ORIGINAL WW2 JAPANESE IMPERIAL ARMY OFFICERS SAMURAI SWORD 1580 SIGNED-img-7

1OO% ORIGINAL WW2 JAPANESE IMPERIAL ARMY OFFICERS SAMURAI SWORD 1580 SIGNED-img-5
1OO% ORIGINAL WW2 JAPANESE IMPERIAL ARMY OFFICERS SAMURAI SWORD 1580 SIGNED-img-2

1OO% ORIGINAL WW2 JAPANESE IMPERIAL ARMY OFFICERS SAMURAI SWORD 1580 SIGNED-img-3

1OO% ORIGINAL WW2 JAPANESE IMPERIAL ARMY OFFICERS SAMURAI SWORD 1580 SIGNED-img-4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure but i think the stamp is faked.

Can you make a better picture of it?

 

The nakago without the mei and that stamp looks well made not bad. But the shape of the blade looks not good. The kissaki looks terrible.

I would stay away from that sword.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, 16k said:

Wartime blade made in Seki. Nakago with Takanoha and sanbonsugi typical of Seki blades during WW2. Probably oil tempered too.

 

I think not JP.

This is not a Japanese work. The shape of the boshi is very crude.

image.png.be97ed63d9d4e2ee8394f37b9dcc3461.png

 

Maybe under the habaki you find a welded nakago?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mounts are odd, the blade tip is at best reshaped, and I have seen nakago' welded onto  dodgy blades in the past. There may very well be genuine elements to this package but why buy when there are so many issues. Walk away, and don't turn round.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seki sword. Looks broken and then given a quick and dirty repair job.

Mei is subject of some disagreement on the internet. Smith name is Yoshiomi, but the second kanji of the family name is...debatable. 

 

Looks to me like 武義臣作 (Takemasa Yoshiomi saku)

 

However some sites claim it is 武義臣作 (Takeyama Yoshiomi saku)

 

Maybe someone out there has more info. 

 

Takemasa

https://www.togishi-touken.jp/研磨料金表/お受け出来ない御刀見本/

Takeyama

yoshomi2.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve that is a very interesting link - thanks for sharing.

Btw: He said that the sakura showa stamp indicates that the stamped sword can be used in the coldest regions of manchuria. I read on Ohmuras site from swords which made for temperatures under -45° celsius but that the sakura stamp indicates that is new for me.

 

image.png.94a9e64a4abe62f998a7881daa31abf8.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, vajo said:

Steve that is a very interesting link - thanks for sharing.

Btw: He said that the sakura showa stamp indicates that the stamped sword can be used in the coldest regions of manchuria. I read on Ohmuras site from swords which made for temperatures under -45° celsius but that the sakura stamp indicates that is new for me.

 

 

I find that claim to be a little dubious. As a stamp it is fairly common and has other documented reasons for being applied. There were swords specifically made for low temperature use, and they were marked as such, not just with a sakura.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, vajo said:

He said that the sakura showa stamp indicates that the stamped sword can be used in the coldest regions of manchuria.

It would be interesting if one of our Japanese speakers would use his contact link to ask him his source for that.  I recall reading a discussion where the cold testing was done on blades, even showing pictures of bent blades, but there was no mention of stamping those that passed.  I'm sure the Army Sword division had testing requirements that could possibly have cold temp standards, but I doubt the stamp was specific to that characteristic.  I also don't believe that ALL swords were impact tested.  As I understand it, a smith was required to submit 1 or 2 blades for testing.  If passed, then all of his work was accepted.

 

It doesn't sound like he understands the history of the stamping requirement very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Bruce Pennington said:

It would be interesting if one of our Japanese speakers would use his contact link to ask him his source for that.  I recall reading a discussion where the cold testing was done on blades, even showing pictures of bent blades, but there was no mention of stamping those that passed.  I'm sure the Army Sword division had testing requirements that could possibly have cold temp standards, but I doubt the stamp was specific to that characteristic.  I also don't believe that ALL swords were impact tested.  As I understand it, a smith was required to submit 1 or 2 blades for testing.  If passed, then all of his work was accepted.

 

It doesn't sound like he understands the history of the stamping requirement very well.

This would be that article Bruce:

 

http://www.nihontocraft.com/Nihonto_cold_weather.html

 

Also, a sword made for cold weather:


http://www.nihontocraft.com/Ura_Nihon_no_Toko.html

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...