Jump to content

Lo! And Weep! The most beautiful utsushi in the world!

16k
 Share

Recommended Posts

DirkO Mentor

DirkO

Posted
Posted

Personally I'd go for the Tombogiri utsushi:

 

post-355-0-90932600-1591336755_thumb.jpg

 

Asahitoken usually has quite a few of his pieces for sale, which is really showing off Ono Yoshimitsu's skill in various traditions, even though indeed he's most famous for his Yamatorige utsushi, which are absolutely a joy to watch and handle!

 

http://asahitoken.jp/contents/01_token/product/token-O.html

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pete Klein Grand Master

Pete Klein

Posted
Posted

Even though I don't 'collect' swords I have followed Ono san's work for some time now (just because I would love to be able to have one) and it seems most of the ones up for sale go for ~2.5 => 3 MY.  The one top post might just prove this incorrect as it's quite something and is I believe published in the big Ono book from awhile back.  I should have kept my copy...  that's my lament.

 

https://www.japaneseswordbooksandtsuba.com/store/books/b993-ono-yoshimitsu-juka-choji-no-sekai-full-translation

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gakusee Mentor

Gakusee

Posted
Posted

So, I mentally struggle a bit with that concept of brittleness causing the ochoji hamon to subside.

Theoretically that makes sense of course, but such hamon was produced for around 30-40 years (roughly 1230-1270). If it was brittle and ineffective, it would have disappeared within 1-3 years, maximum 5-10 years. Yet, we see several decades of obusa choji, juka choji, fukuro choji, etc.

 

People often cite the Mongol invasions (1271/84) as watershed moments after which the large choji came out of fashion. Indeed, that is evident in the work of Nagamitsu and Kagemitsu. Their progenitor, Mitsutada, started off with small hamon rendered in konie in the fashion of KoBizen smiths. Then he evolved to beautiful kawazuko and ochoji in nioi in mid 1250s. At the same time, the same happened to Fukuoka Ichimonji guys like Yoshifusa and Sukezane.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
16k Grand Master

16k

Posted
  • Author
Posted

If I were to take a guess (I’m no expert or metallurgist), I’d say those kind of Hamon both have advantages and disadvantages. The Hamon might be more brittle, but at the saMe time, it is so large that it allows for repolishing and removing the dents easily. And on the plus side, the numerous ashi probably provide release area for the tension the blade might suffer. Perhaps it only disappeared because of the simple evolution in the swordsmiths understanding of metal strength and weakness. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gakusee Mentor

Gakusee

Posted
Posted

Well, the ashi indeed were there as a means to prevent a longitudinal split.

 

Also, in order to reduce the tension, mid Kamakura Bizen smiths forged the hamon in nioi when they employed larger choji. Less brittle that way. Their predecessors did it in nie and konie.

Also the hada had less nie overall (“appearing soft” is often heard) but that was of course offset by the addition of Utsuri (a bit of differential hardening there with more nie). So, they were quite skilled these guys and we cannot jump to simple conclusions.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNSSHOGUN Grand Master

PNSSHOGUN

Posted
Posted

Michael, I was certainly not referring to the Ko-Bizen blades but more so the tendencies of modern smiths to produce elaborate works not focused on being the best swords for war, but more for appreciation. While the techniques for making beautiful blades are intertwined with their prowess as weapons one can't help but think not many people are testing a $30,000 sword on heavy Mongol armour these days. Then again here is a sword made by Yoshindo Yoshihara used to cut a Kabuto without any noticeable damage.

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alex A Grand Master

Alex A

Posted
Posted

Just as an example, 

 

A thick battle sword from the end of the Muromachi period, with a rather broad hamon.

 

When i first saw it, it did make me wonder a bit with regards brittleness.

 

https://www.toukenkomachi.com/index_en_tachi&katana_A090819.html

 

Ive brought this sword up before and hope the owner does not mind, its a good sword.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChrisW Veteran

ChrisW

Posted
Posted

It is probably a delicate interplaying ratio of thickness. Extremely thick hardened edged swords tend to be more brittle/bend less and when they fail, fail catastrophically. But they probably also polish out chips much easier. Thinner-edged hamon swords tend to bend rather than break, but after so much polishing or a deep enough chip, become just as broken. So a nice middle ground that allows for a thick-enough hamon to be durable for repair but have enough soft spine to allow the sword to flex and bend when necessary instead of snapping. I'd like to think that the ancient smiths eventually found the right ratios for the hamon patterns they were exploring.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
16k Grand Master

16k

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just as an example, 

 

A thick battle sword from the end of the Muromachi period, with a rather broad hamon.

 

When i first saw it, it did make me wonder a bit with regards brittleness.

 

https://www.toukenkomachi.com/index_en_tachi&katana_A090819.html

 

Ive brought this sword up before and hope the owner does not mind, its a good sword.

when you see this sword, you have to wonder why Takeda has such a mediocre reputation. This sword is gorgeous.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
paulb Grand Master

paulb

Posted
Posted

Before we go too far down the "Snob appeal route"  Some of the Takeda smiths were known to make exceptionally good copies of other schools work.

The problem is less of sophistication and more of attribution.  They focussed on making copies of classical works. As a result they had no specific style of their own and although very talented (some of them) they had no individual traits that distinguished them. In a nation that enjoys order and conformity that creates a problem.

I have seen one or two Takeda blades that have been previously attributed to good level Osafune smiths which were beautiful. However the Bungo Takeda attribution has for some time been used as a catch all attribution for anything that could not be easily fitted in to a specific school. As a result you see huge variation in quality and style.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alex A Grand Master

Alex A

Posted
Posted

I like Akamatsu Taro and there is no denying they make some great blades.

 

They make a lot of Kiyomaro style blades, I see why they are appealing.

 

For me though, there is a step up with regards quality of the hamon with regards skill and consistency.

 

Lets face it though, if they sell, then maybe that's enough.

 

Just rambling and what do iknow 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...